Showing posts with label Thomas de Weyland. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Thomas de Weyland. Show all posts

Tuesday, January 9, 2018

Sodbury manor and the market town of Chipping Sodbury

Sodbury manor and the market town of Chipping Sodbury

Niall C.E.J. O’Brien

Chipping Sodbury is a market town in south Gloucestershire about 14 miles north-east of Bristol. Before the Norman Conquest Old Sodbury which included the later borough of Chipping Sodbury, was owned by Brictric son of Algar. By the time of the Domesday Survey in 1086 the king held Sodbury.[1]

Sodbury under the Crassus family

By the early years of the 13th century Sodbury came to the Crassus family and the character of Sodbury manor changed forever. William Crassus had married a sister of William Marshal and was the father of five sons the eldest two of whom were named William Craasus the elder and William Crassus the younger. It was William Crassus the elder who got the charter for the market at Sodbury in 1218 and in 1224 was made seneschal of Leinster in Ireland for his uncle, William Marshal.[2] The borough of Chipping Sodbury was created on a virgin site according to the research of Maurice Beresford, one of the few such medieval towns in Gloucestershire, in the first twenty years of the 13th century.[3]

The name of Chipping Sodbury translates as ‘market place of the new town’ and the market was an important feature in the new town.[4] On 12th August 1218 Henry III allowed William Crassus to have a Monday market at Chipping Sodbury.[5] On 24th May 1227 Henry III granted a charter for a Thursday market at Chipping Sodbury while at the same time granting an annual fair on the Nativity of John the Baptist (24th June) for three days.[6]

The market and fair at Chipping Sodbury, like at other towns across the country, provided the main venue for the purchase and sale of goods in the medieval period. The weekly market was geared for local trade while the annual fair (usually held over three days) provided access to the regional trade routes.[7]

Market area of Chipping Sodbury

Records across the ages give us a glimpse of the burgage plots and the burgesses who made the new town home. In 1255 Muriel de Kidderminster acted as plaintiff in a case of mort d’ancestor for a burgage plot in Chipping Sodbury against Philip de Patepull and Alice, daughter of Geoffrey de Lyegrove. Muriel remised and quitclaimed the plot to Philip and Alice in consideration of 46s 8d.[8] It would appear that most of the burgage plots in Chipping Sodbury were laid out in a regular size with 33 feet fronting the High Street as the norm such as the grants by Adam of Horwood, and John Brown, burgesses of Chipping Sodbury in the 14th century.[9]

Sodbury under the Weyland family

By 1270 Sodbury had passed from the Crassus family to that of Weyland. On 6th November 1270 Henry III granted a charter to William de Weyland to hold a Monday market at Chipping Sodbury and an annual fair on 29th August. In 1280 the old date of 24th June was restored for the holding of the annual fair.[10]

In 1276 John de Brandeston and Marsilia, his wife and former wife of William de Weyland, claimed a third part of Sodbury as her dower against Thomas Weyland (brother of William) and other property. In court Marsilia gave up the claim for a third of Sodbury in exchange for the manor of Middleton in Suffolk.[11] For an account of the Weyland estates in Suffolk see http://celtic2realms-medievalnews.blogspot.ie/2017/08/john-de-weyland-estate-in-1312-suffolk.html  

In 1278 Geoffrey de Aspale granted Sodbury manor to Thomas Weyland, Margery, his wife and Richard their son to hold for the lives of Thomas and Margery with remainder to Richard and his heirs.[12] On 15th November 1280 Edward I granted a charter for a Thursday market at Chipping Sodbury to Thomas Weyland.[13] In July 1290 King Edward instructed the sheriff of Gloucester to return Sodbury manor to Margery and Richard after it was taken into the king’s hand due to the felony of Thomas Weyland. The king had inspected the charter of Geoffrey de Aspale and was satisfied with its contents. But by November 1290, Margery and Richard Weyland had to appoint Robert de Denham and Thomas his brother as attorneys to demand against the king in the king’s own court for the return of Sodbury manor. Thomas Weyland had fled the country because of a felony and the king had seized Sodbury. In March 1291 the king ordered the sheriff of Gloucester to restore Sodbury to Margery and Richard.[14]

Meanwhile in 1283 Thomas Weyland granted property in Ireland to William le Gras, which William formerly held from William de Weyland, in exchange for William le Gras acknowledging that Sodbury belonged to Thomas Weyland, his wife Margery and their son Richard.[15]

Sodbury under the Earls of Gloucester

In January 1296 it was found that Gilbert de Clare, Earl of Gloucester and Hertford held the manor of Sodbury with two parks containing 69 acres and a quarter of the salt receivable at Wych (worth 16d). There were also gardens, dovecotes, two mills, 454 acres of arable land in demesne with pasture, meadow, villeinage and cottars with rents from free tenants and assizes. There was also 2s 6d from Netepeny while the assize rents of Chipping Sodbury were £9 11s 7d. The Earl also had the toll of the market and fair at Chipping Sodbury which was held jointly with his wife Joan, daughter of King Edward. The market was worth 40s per year. The heirs of William Crassus held one knight’s fee at Sodbury while the total value of the manor was £41 5s 5d.[16]

On 24th May 1307 a detailed inquisition post mortem was made concerning Sodbury. It found the manor contained, with other property, about 600 arable areas, two water mills, two dovecotes, pasture and meadow along with a deer park and a park without deer at La Leigrave along with a tenement at Bridehwike.[17] In May 1228 the area around Sodbury was excluded from the royal forest of Horwood with a right to possess deer independent of the royal deer.[18] In 1303 some persons unknown took some deer in the park belonging to John de Wylyngton near Yate-by-Sodbury.[19] In 1310 other people illegally entered the deer parks of Gilbert de Clare at Sodbury while the property was in the king’s hand.[20] In 1307 the whole manor of Sodbury was worth £49 6s 7d including Chipping Sodbury, free tenants and villeins.[21] The whole manor was held by Joan de Clare, daughter of King Edward I and wife of the late Gilbert de Clare, Earl of Gloucester and Hertford. Gilbert de Clare had Sodbury jointly with his wife in chief of the king by the service of one knight’s fee. Gilbert de Clare, then aged seventeen years, was her son and heir.[22]

By 1307 the market town of Chipping Sodbury had 90 burgesses holding 176 burger plots and paying £9 14s 1½d per year. In 1307 the fair day was held on the Nativity of St. John the Baptist. The value of the fair is unknown as the inquisition document was damaged at that point but we do known that the toll of the market was worth 30s while the market town with pleas and perquisites of the manor was worth £15 7s 2d.[23] It appears that the value of the market at Chipping Sodbury had declined by a quarter in the eleven years between 1296 and 1307.

In 1322 William Aylmer was appointed to keep and survey the wainage and stock of Sodbury manor and numerous other places in Gloucestershire, Oxfordshire and Worcestershire and was later joined by John de Donestable to share the workload.[24]

Sodbury under the Despenser family

By the 1330s Sodbury had come under the control of the le Despenser family, the power brokers behind King Edward II. On 30th June 1337 Eleanor, wife of the late Hugh le Despenser, died. She held at the time of her death various property in Oxfordshire, Worcestershire and Gloucestershire (Tewkesbury, Stoke Orchard, Fairford and Sodbury). At Sodbury she had the manor with the deer park and two fairs in Chipping Sodbury and the market. The manor was held of the king in chief by the service of one knight’s fee. Hugh le Despenser, her first born son, was her heir and was aged about twenty-nine years old.[25]

Elsewhere we are told that the capital messuage at Sodbury was worth nothing because the house cost more to upkeep than what it yielded. There was a dovecote worth 3s 4d and a windmill just worth 6s 6d as it was in a bad state of repair. There was 460 acres of arable land of which 307 acres was sold before Eleanor’s death for 102s 4d. The remaining arable land was in fallow. There was 50 acres of pasture worth 12s 6d and a park for wild animals. The rent of the assizes was worth £11 14s 10¾d per year. The pleas and perquisites of the court was 10s per year and there were 15 customary tenants.[26]

The poor and rundown state of the manor of Sodbury is contrasted by the growth of the borough of Chipping Sodbury. By 1337 there were two fairs Chipping Sodbury at the feasts of the Ascension and the Nativity of St. John the Baptist along with the market. The Ascension fair was worth 30s and that of St. John the Baptist 40s while the toll of the market was 5s. The growth in the town is reflected in the rent of the burgesses of Chipping Sodbury which increased from £9 14s 1½d in 1307 to £9 18s 6½d in 1337.[27]

Sodbury fair

In April 1344 Hugh le Despenser appealed leave to the king to grant the manor of Sodbury to three clerks in trust, Edmund de Grymesby, John le Hamslape and William de Oseberstone. It was stated that Hugh le Despenser held Sodbury from the Earl of Gloucester by the service of receiving the Earl at the west side of the manor and escorting him to the east side. The jury of the inquisition taken at Sodbury found it no damage to the king if the clerks granted Sodbury to Hugh le Despenser and his wife Elizabeth. The manor was at that time worth £50. In June 1344 the king allowed the enfeoffment.[28] 

Alina, late the wife of Sir Edward Burnel died on 16th May 1363. An inquisition post mortem, made at Sodbury, found that she held the manor of Sodbury for life of the king in chief by one knight’s fee as a gift from Hugh le Despenser. The borough of Chipping Sodbury had two fairs per year, at the feasts of the Invention of the Holy Cross and the Nativity of St. John the Baptist. The manor of Sodbury reverted to Edward le Despenser, kinsman of Hugh le Despenser, on the death of Alina Burnel.[29] Sir Edward Burnel had died in 1316 to be succeeded by his sister Matilda, wife of John Lovel.[30]

Sir Edward le Despenser died on 12th November 1375 leaving his two year old son, Thomas le Despenser, as heir. Sir Edward le Despenser held the manor of Sodbury in Gloucestershire with the borough of Chipping Sodbury of the king in chief. The manor included a pasture called Mansedmede and a close called Leigrave along with a deer park. There were at that time two fairs in Chipping Sodbury at the feasts of the Ascension and St. John the Baptist.[31]

In 1378 Isabel, wife of Edward le Despenser, was instructed to pay David Hunt 2d (pence) per day as keeper of Sodbury park for life as long as the park remained in the king’s hand.[32]

Sodbury in the fifteenth century

In 1405 Richard Mawerdyn was appointed by the king as steward and parker at Sodbury which was then in the king’s hand owing to the minority of Lord le Despenser.[33] In April 1405 King Henry IV granted the manor of Sodbury and the borough of Chipping Sodbury to his wife, Queen Joan.[34] By the 1430s Chipping Sodbury had been restored to the le Despenser family in the name of Isabel, Countess of Warwick and daughter of Thomas Lord Despenser.[35]

For an account of inquisitions post mortem taken at Chipping Sodbury between 1419 and 1422 see http://celtic2realms-medievalnews.blogspot.ie/2014/12/inquisitions-post-mortem-at-chipping.html

Sodbury in the sixteenth and seventeenth century

But by 1522 Sodbury was back in royal hands. In the 1522 military survey there were about 77 financial contributors to the military fund from Chipping Sodbury. Eight of these people were weavers while others included a cordwainer, tailor, and shoemaker. Sir Anthony Poyntz was then steward of the town.[36]

Chipping Sodbury was still listed as a market town in about 1600 but by then its fortunes appear to have declined somewhat. Although in the sixteenth century the town and surrounding area sent apprentices to Bristol, no apprentices were sent to Oxford and in the seventeenth century no apprentices went to Gloucester.[37] There is equally no reference to Chipping Sodbury among the inquisitions post mortem taken in the reign of King Charles the First.[38]

Sodbury in modern times

By the nineteenth century Chipping Sodbury was noted as an ancient market town with a population in 1870 of 1,112 people. The trade of the town was then chiefly in cheese and malt.[39] In 1870 there was a market on the first Tuesday of every month and two annual fairs, Holy Thursday and 24th June.[40] Until the 1950s Chipping Sodbury was still a relatively small town serving as a market town for the surrounding area but since then the motor car has made the town in a large commercial and commuter town for Bristol.

In 1974 Chipping Sodbury was taken from Gloucestershire and made part of the new county of Avon. But in 1996 Chipping Sodbury returned to the ceremonial county of Gloucestershire with the abolition of Avon as a county to be part of the unitary authority of South Gloucestershire. In 2001 Chipping Sodbury was still described as a market town with 5,066 people but since then the town has become part of the larger urban area of Yate with a combined population of over 26,000.[41]

===============

End of post

===============




[1] Taylor, C., An analysis of the Domesday Survey of Gloucestershire (Bristol, 1889), pp. 190, 300, 301
[2] Brooks, E. St. John, Knights’ Fees in Counties Wexford, Carlow and Kilkenny in 13th to 15th Century (Stationery Office, Dublin, 1950), pp. 72, 73
[3] Herbert, N., ‘Northleach: New Light on the Making of a Gloucestershire Town’, in Bettey, J. (ed.), Archives & Local History in Bristol & Gloucestershire: Essays in Honour of David Smith (Bristol & Gloucestershire Archaeological Society, 2007), pp. 17-26, at p. 19
[4] Baddeley, W. St. Clair, Gloucestershire Place-names (Gloucester, 1913), pp. 42, 143
[7] Kowaleski, M., Local Markets and Regional Trade in Medieval Exeter (Cambridge, 1995), p. 41
[8] Elrington, C.R. (ed.), Abstracts of feet of fines relating to Gloucestershire 1199-1299 (Bristol & Gloucestershire Archaeological Society, Gloucestershire Record Series, vol. 16, 2003), no. 561
[9] Walker, D. (ed.), The Cartulary of St. Augustine’s Abbey, Bristol (Bristol & Gloucestershire Archaeological Society, Gloucestershire Record Series, Vol. 10, 1998), add. doc. nos. 26, 27
[11] Elrington, C.R. (ed.), Abstracts of feet of fines relating to Gloucestershire 1199-1299 (Bristol & Gloucestershire Archaeological Society, Gloucestershire Record Series, vol. 16, 2003), no. 810
[12] Elrington, C.R. (ed.), Abstracts of feet of fines relating to Gloucestershire 1199-1299 (Bristol & Gloucestershire Archaeological Society, Gloucestershire Record Series, vol. 16, 2003), no. 817
[14] Calendar of Close Rolls, Edward I, 1288-1296, pp. 96, 147, 163
[15] Elrington, C.R. (ed.), Abstracts of feet of fines relating to Gloucestershire 1199-1299 (Bristol & Gloucestershire Archaeological Society, Gloucestershire Record Series, vol. 16, 2003), no. 855
[16] Madge, S.J. (ed.), Abstracts of Inquisitions Post Mortem for Gloucestershire, Part IV, 20 Henry III to 29 Edward I, 1236-1300 (London, 1903), pp. 183, 184; Sharp, J.E.E.S. (ed.), Calendar of Inquisitions post mortem preserved in the Public Record Office, Vol. III, Edward 1 (Kraus reprint, 1973), no. 371
[17] Fry, E.A. (ed.), Abstracts of Inquisitions Post Mortem for Gloucestershire, part V, 30 Edward I to 32 Edward III, 1302-1358 (British Record Society, London, 1910), pp. 81, 82, 83, 84, 85
[18] Dryburgh, P. & Hartland, B. (ed.), Calendar of the Fine Rolls of the Reign of Henry III, volume II, 9 to 18 Henry III, 1224-1234 (London, 2008), nos. 12/171, 14/177
[19] Calendar of Patent Rolls, Edward I, 1303-1307, p. 184
[20] Calendar of Patent Rolls, Edward II, 1307-1313, p. 261
[21] Fry (ed.), Abstracts of Inquisitions Post Mortem for Gloucestershire, part V, 1302-1358, p. 85
[22] Sharp (ed.), Calendar of Inquisitions post mortem, Vol. IV, Edward 1, no. 435
[23] Fry (ed.), Abstracts of Inquisitions Post Mortem for Gloucestershire, part V, 1302-1358, pp. 84, 85
[24] Calendar of Patent Rolls, Edward III, 1321-1324, pp. 112, 118
[25] Sharp (ed.), Calendar of Inquisitions post mortem, Vol. VIII, Edward II1, no. 132
[26] Fry, E.A. (ed.), Abstracts of Inquisitions Post Mortem for Gloucestershire, part V, 30 Edward I to 32 Edward III, 1302-1358 (British Record Society, London, 1910), p. 265
[27] Fry, E.A. (ed.), Abstracts of Inquisitions Post Mortem for Gloucestershire, part V, 30 Edward I to 32 Edward III, 1302-1358 (British Record Society, London, 1910), p. 265
[28] Fry (ed.), Abstracts of Inquisitions Post Mortem for Gloucestershire, part V, 1302-1358, pp. 303, 304; Calendar of Patent Rolls, Edward III, 1343-1345, p. 268
[29] Dawes, C.B. & others (eds.), Calendar of Inquisitions post mortem preserved in the Public Record Office, Vol. XI, Edward II1 (Kraus reprint, 1973), no. 489
[30] Fry (ed.), Abstracts of Inquisitions Post Mortem for Gloucestershire, part V, 1302-1358, pp. 156, 157
[31] Chapman, J.B.W. & Dawes, C.B. (eds.), Calendar of Inquisitions post mortem preserved in the Public Record Office, Vol. XIV, Edward II1 (Kraus reprint, 1986), no. 209
[32] Calendar of Close Rolls, Richard II, 1377-1383, p. 49
[33] Calendar of Patent Rolls, Henry IV, 1401-1405, p. 494
[34] Calendar of Patent Rolls, Henry IV, 1405-1408, p. 4
[35] Noble, C. (ed.), Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem, volume XXV, 16 to 20 Henry VI, 1437-1442 (London, 2009), nos. 310, 330
[36] Hoyle, R.W. (ed.), The military survey of Gloucestershire, 1522 (Bristol & Gloucestershire Archaeological Society, Gloucestershire Record Series, Vol. 6, 1993), p. 3
[37] Hollis, D. (ed.), Calendar of the Bristol Apprentice Book, 1532-1565, Part I, 1532-1542 (Bristol Record Society, Vol. XIV, 1948), Ms. p. 94, 165, 212; Ralph, E. & Hardwick, N.M. (eds.), Calendar of the Bristol Apprentice Book, 1532-1565, Part II, 1542-1552 (Bristol Record Society, Vol. XXXIII, 1980), nos. 262, 644, 647, 871, 1235, 1295, 1376, 1740; Ralph, E. (ed.), Calendar of the Bristol Apprentice Book, 1532-1565, Part III, 1552-1565 (Bristol Record Society, Vol. XLIII, 1992), nos. 27, 65, 703; Crossley, A. (ed.), Oxford City Apprentices, 1513-1602 (Oxford Historical Society, New Series, Vol. XLIV, 2012); Barlow, J. (ed.), A calendar of the registers of Apprentice of the city of Gloucester, 1595-1700 (Bristol & Gloucestershire Archaeological Society, Gloucestershire Record Series, Vol. 14, 2001);
[38] Fry, E.A. (ed.), Abstracts of Gloucestershire Inquisitions Post Mortem in the reign of Charles the First, 1625-1642 (London, 1899)
[39] Anon, The National Encyclopedia (13 vols. London, 1870), vol. 6, p. 825

Wednesday, August 30, 2017

John de Weyland estate in 1312 Suffolk and the story behind it

John de Weyland estate in 1312 Suffolk and the story behind it

Niall C.E.J. O’Brien


On 30th October 1312 the inquisition post mortem of John de Weyland was held in Suffolk where Richard de Weyland, his son of twenty-two years, was found to be his heir. In 1312 John de Weyland had ten and a half manors in Suffolk along with a messuage and 60 acres at Pethage from Guy le Feire by the service of 2s yearly. These manors were held from eight different owners and John de Weyland held no property directly from the king.[1] The history of these ten manors can be traced in a patchwork manner in the decades before John de Weyland gain possession as outlined below.

Most of the property it seems was acquired by John’s father, Thomas de Weyland, a long serving Chief Justice on the Common Pleas until he was arrested and exiled in 1290 for assisting two of his servants to avoid justice after they had committed a murder.[2]

The Weyland family possibly took their name from the village of Weyland in Norfolk which gave its name to a hundred in that county.[3]

Blaxhale manor
Among the properties John de Weyland held in Suffolk in 1312 was half the manor of Blaxhale with the advowson of the church from Roger Bigod, Earl of Norfolk, by his manor of Donningworth and after 1307, from Sir Thomas de Brotherton by the service of half a knight’s fee. The other half of the manor was held by Robert de Ufford.[4]

At one time Walter de Ryboef held the manor of Blaxhale from the Earl Marshal (by service of ¾ knight’s fee) and Robert de Waleynes (by service of ½ knight’s fee).[5] In 1258 Thomas de Weyland purchased Blaxhale manor for 300 marks.[6]

In July 1270 Roger le Bigod, Earl of Norfolk held the advowson of Blaxhale by his manor of Donningworth which with three other advowsons was held of the king by his honour of Eye by the service of 5 knight’s fees.[7] In November 1300 Donningworth, Blaxhale and Wantisden with three other places were held from Edmund, Earl of Cornwall, by 5 knight’s fees.[8]

In 1290 Thomas de Weyland had possession of Blaxhale manor and the advowson by the service of a knight’s fees to Roger le Bigod, Earl of Norfolk and Earl Marshal, and a ½ knight’s fee to Robert de Waleynes. The Earl’s portion of the manor was worth £19 1s ¼d while the part belonging to Robert de Waleynes was worth 40s.[9] Sometime before 1290 Thomas de Weyland granted Blaxhale manor to Sir James son of Gilbert de Iiletelshale in exchange for Thomas getting the manors of Kelling and Hedenham with the advowson of Hedenham. Afterwards Thomas de Weyland gave the manors of Kelling and Hedenham to James and James his son wile reserving the advowson while James gave Thomas and his son, John de Weyland, the manor of Blaxhale. James did no service for Blaxhale to the Earl Marshal but Thomas always did. The manor of Blaxhale was worth £20 and the year and day of waste was worth £30.[10] This double transaction was possibly a way for Thomas de Weyland to protect his property from any potential prosecution he may be subject to as a result of his questionable actions as Chief Justice of the Common Pleas.

In July 1304 a commission was established to discover who knocked down various houses of John de Weyland at Blaxhale and cut down trees and carried away the timber from the trees and houses. Houses and trees were also destroyed at John’s other manors of Clopton, Wytnesham, Wantesden, Middleton, Onehouse, Welhetham and Pethawe.[11]

In February 1307 John de Weyland held one knight’s fee from Roger Bigod, Earl of Norfolk, for the manors of Blaxhale, Brigge and Glemham.[12]

Blaxhall Church 

Assch (Ash Bocking) manor

In 1312 John de Weyland held the manor of Assch from Alice Bigod by the service of half a knight’s fee.[13] In 1272-3 Giles de Wachesham had a quarter knight’s fee at Assch held by Guy de Ais.[14]
An inquisition in March 1290 said that Thomas de Weyland held Assch manor from the Earl of Norfolk by the service of ¼ knight’s fee. It was said the manor was worth £8 0s 3½d and the year and a day of waste was worth 10s 4d. Another inquisition on 11th May 1290 said that Thomas de Weyland, Margery his wife and Richard, his son, and Richard’s heirs, held Assch manor of Sir William de Staunton by the service of ½ knight’s fee. The manor was worth £9 and the yearly waste one mark.[15]

In February 1307 Margery de Moyse, widow of Thomas de Weyland, held a half knight’s fee at Assch from Roger Bigod, Earl of Norfolk.[16] Thomas de Weyland went to live in Paris after his exile and returned to England in 1297 after receiving a pardon where he died in 1298.[17]

Wantisden manor

In 1312 John de Weyland had the manor of Wantisden which was held of John de Colevyll by the service of 2s yearly.[18] The record of an inquisition taken in July 1290 has only partially survived but it associates Thomas de Weyland with the manor of Wantisden but under what terms he held it is unknown.[19] In about 1266 Thomas de Weyland married Anna, daughter of Richard Colvill and had a son, John de Weyland of the 1312 inquisition.[20] It is possible that Thomas de Weyland acquired Wantisden by marriage.

In August 1290 a commission was appointed to discover who pulled down the houses of John son of Thomas de Weyland in his manors of Wantisden, Clopton and Wittelesham.[21] In November 1300 Edmund, Earl of Cornwall, held Wantisden from whom it was held by Roger Bigod, Earl of Norfolk, by 5 knight’s fees with other places like Blaxhale.[22] John de Weyland held Wantisden in 1304 when houses and trees were destroyed there.[23]

Middilton manor

In 1312 John de Weyland also had Middilton manor with the advowson of the church from Drew de Barentyn by the service of quarter of a knight’s fee.[24] In March 1269 William de Criketot held the manor and advowson of Middleton by the service of one knight’s fee from William de Blanmoster.[25] John de Weyland held Middleton in 1304 when houses and trees were destroyed there.[26] Before October 1305 Richard de Weyland and Joan his wife held Middleton (in Norfolk) where they jointly enfeoffed Robert de Scales and Isabel his wife of certain tenements.[27] In February 1307 John de Thorp held 3½ knight’s fees in the manors of Middleton, Iokesford and Helmingham from Roger Bigod, Earl of Norfolk.[28]

Clopton manor

In 1312 John de Weyland held Clopton manor with the advowson of the church from Thomas de la Sale Ars by the service of 1d per year.[29] In June 1253 William le Rus held Clopton manor with Hasketun manor from Roger Bigod, the Earl Marshal, by the service of one knight’s fee for both manors. A later inquisition in March 1260 said that William le Rus held the manors of Akeham, Hasketun and Clopton from the Earl Marshal of the honour of Lancaster by the service of 2½ knight’s fees and 20s yearly to the guard of Lancaster.[30]

In July 1290 the sheriff of Suffolk was ordered to restore the manor of Clopton to John son of Thomas de Weyland after the manor was previously seized by the king for the felony of Thomas de Weyland. Not only did Thomas de Weyland commit a felony but exiled from the country (or fled the country as some documents say it). An inquisition found that Thomas and John de Weyland were jointly enfeoffed of the manor by Oliver de Wysete.[31] The manor was held of Hugh le Despenser by knight’s service and was worth £10 yearly.[32]

In November 1293 Isabel de Fortibus, Countess of Albemarle, held Clopton manor from the king by the service of a sparrow-hawk and on her death King Edward became her heir for Clopton.[33] In January 1298 Clopton, Wytingham, Hasketon and Akenham were held by Roger Bigod, Earl of Norfolk from Edmund, Earl of Cornwall by 3 knight’s fees. In January 1298 the four manors were held by Lady Alice de Brewose from the Earl of Norfolk rendering 30s yearly to the guard of Lancaster castle.[34]

In 1304 John de Weyland held Clopton manor when houses and trees were destroyed there.[35] In February 1307 Giles de Brewosa held 3¾ knight’s fees on the manors of Akenham, Hasketon, Wytingham and Clopton from Roger Bigod, Earl of Norfolk.[36]

Clopton Church by Geoff Pick

Swynlaund (Swilland) manor

In 1312 John de Weyland had the two manors of Swynlaund and Wytlisham from Sir James de Ilketishale by the service of a rose per year.[37] In 1314 Gilbert de Clare, Earl of Gloucester and Hereford, had part of a knight’s fee at Swynlaund.[38] Over the border in Norfolk, long before 1291, Thomas de Weyland had given the manor of Kelling to James son of Gilbert de Ilektishale and James his son (the later Sir James). Subsequently James senior gave the manor back to Thomas de Weyland without the permission of James junior. The manor was taken into the king’s hand following the felony of Thomas de Weyland.[39] An inquisition in June 1290 said that Thomas de Weyland only held Swilland from Philip Harneys for ten days before he was declared a felon.[40] In January 1291 the king ordered the manor to be restored to James junior.[41]

Wytlisham (Witnesham) manor

In 1312 John de Weyland had the manor of Wytlisham from Sir James de Ilketishale by the service of a rose with Swynlaund manor.[42] In April 1311 Giles de Brewosa claimed to have the manor of Witnesham jointly with his wife Joan of the Countess Marshal.[43] John de Weyland had married a daughter of Sir Richard Brewosa and so was related to Giles de Brewosa.[44]

Later in November 1311 it was found that Witnesham did not form part of Giles’s property but after the death of Alice de Bello Monte should have reverted to Joan, wife of Giles and her son Richard.[45] In 1326 Alice de Bello Monte held Witnesham manor of the inheritance of Robert son of Giles de Brewosa of the Bishop of Norwich by his manor of Baketon by the service of 2¼ knight’s fees. In 1326 a ¼ knight’s fee was held at Witnesham by Robert de Weyland while the heirs of Richard de Weyland held another ¼ with Nicholas Fouch having another ¼ fee.[46]

The manor of Witnesham had a long association with the Weyland family as in about 1220s Herbert de Weyland married Beatrice, one of the six daughters of Stephen Witnesham. This Herbert was said to be the father of John, Richard, Wiliam and Thomas de Weyland (the chief justice and felon).[47] An alternative source says that Thomas de Weyland (the justice) was the son of Sir William de Weyland and Marsilla (who in her widowhood married John de Brandon).[48]

In August 1290 John son of Thomas de Weyland held the manor of Wittelesham when unknown persons knocked down a number of houses on the manor.[49] In 1304 John de Weyland held Wytnesham when houses and trees were destroyed there.[50]

Cokefield manor

In 1312 John de Weyland held the manor of Cokefield from the Abbot of Beaumund along with the manor of Bromton in Withernisham by the service of ¾ of a knight’s fee.[51] It is not known who this abbot of Beaumund was. The Abbot of Bury St. Edmunds is recorded as the owner in other documents and in 1312 the abbots there were Thomas of Tottington and Richard of Draughton.[52]

In 1262-3 Richard de Clare, Earl of Gloucester and Hereford, held unspecified knight fees at Cokefield and other places in Suffolk.[53] In Christmas 1263 Hugh de Veer, Earl of Oxford, held Cokefield manor from the Abbot of Bury St. Edmund’s by unknown service.[54] In 1275 Abbot Simon of Bury St. Edmund’s granted Cokefield manor to the prior and convent of same.[55] In October 1296 Robert de Veer, Earl of Oxford, held Cokefield manor from the Abbot of Bury St. Edmund’s for which he yearly rendered 2s 11d and Robert de Veer was his son and heir.[56]

Bromton in Withernisham (Witnesham) manor

In 1312 John de Weyland held the manor of Bromton in Withernisham from the Abbot of Beamund.[57] In August 1326 Robert son and heir of Giles de Brewosa, a minor, held Bromton in Witnesham by the heirs of Richard de Weyland (son of John de Weyland and died 1319) as of the manor of Witnesham by the service of half a knight’s fee. As noted above Alice de Bell Monte held Witnesham manor for life of Robert de Brewosa’s inheritance from the Bishop of Norwich.[58] If the Abbot of Beaumund was supposed to be the Bishop of Norwich then John Salmon was the Bishop in 1312 at the time of the inquisition post mortem of John de Weyland.[59]

Onhous (Onehouse) manor

In 1312 John de Weyland held the manor of Onhous from the Abbot of Bury St. Edmund’s by the service of one eight of a knight’s fee and 1s yearly.[60] The abbey of Bury St. Edmund’s was one of the richest monasteries in the country at the time of the taxation roll in 1291 and at its dissolution in November 1539.[61]

In October 1290 the king ordered Malcolm de Harley to restore the manor of Onehouse to Margery, wife of Thomas de Weyland and Richard de Weyland, her son. The manor was seized by the king following the felony of Thomas de Weyland. Margery and Richard said that they, along with Thomas de Weyland, were jointly enfeoffed of the manor by Alice de Cotenham. But the Abbot of St. Edmund’s claimed that the manor was his and so should have reverted to him and not the king. An inquisition was ordered and a court case arranged to settle the ownership but the Weyland family wouldn’t cooperate until they were restored to the manor first.[62]

In 1304 John de Weyland held the manor of Onehouse when houses and trees were destroyed there and the timber carried away.[63]
When Richard son of John de Weyland died before April 1320 the manor of Le Fenhale in Onehouse was the only property he held in Suffolk apart from some other unnamed tenements he held jointly with his wife Joan who survived Richard. Elsewhere we find the heirs of Richard de Weyland still held many of the properties John de Weyland had.

Le Fenhale in Onehouse was held of the Abbot of Bury St. Edmund’s by the service of one knight’s fee but not of the whole manor. At the same place Richard de Weyland held 24 acres from Lady Cecily de Ufford by 4s of yearly service and a further 30 acres was held of William Sturmyn by the service of 4d yearly. Richard’s heir was his six month old daughter, Cecily.[64]

Onehouse Church

Whelwitham (Welnetham) manor

In 1312 John de Weyland held Whelwitham manor from the Abbot of Bury St. Edmund’s by the service of one eight of a knight’s fee and 1s yearly.[65] In 1281 Thomas de Weyland held Whelnetham where Robert son of Philip was to return a messuage, 45 acres of land, 5 acres of wood, 2 acres of meadow and 12d of rent which he took without right because this property was held as the dower lands of Alice, wife of Philip, and so should have not been given to Robert de Parva Whelnetham.[66] In 1304 John de Weyland held Welhetham when houses and trees were destroyed there and the timber carried away.[67]

Conclusion

The complex story of the above manors of John de Weyland, which he held in 1312, shows how difficult sometimes it is to reconstruct a medieval landed estate. As in nearly every manor there is not single ‘owner’ if owner is the correct word as all the land of England was ultimately owned by the king. Instead you get layers of ownership that often change with a family enfeoffing (entrusting) some of their land to a second party and then getting it back on lifetime lease.

The Inquisitions Post Mortem are a good start in the search for a medieval estate but they do not tell the full story and other sources like the Close Rolls and Patent Rolls or the Inquisitions Miscellaneous or the cartulary of an abbey are needed to add to the story and fill in gaps. As in any search for a medieval estate, information will be found that does not tell the full story but when combined with other information provides a link such as the Weyland family having Wantisden from the Colvill family and a Colvill daughter had married a Weyland and so we could say that Wantisden was a marriage gift. Thus behind the inquisition post mortem of John de Weyland in 1312 is a story that can be applied to other medieval estates to better understand the surviving documents and fill in the gaps for the documents that didn’t survive.

=============

End of post

============





[1] Sharp, J.E.E.S. (ed.), Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem, vol. V, Edward II (Liechtenstein, 1973), no. 390
[2] Prestwich, M., Edward 1 (Berkeley, 1988), p. 339
[3] Calendar of Patent Rolls, Edward 1, 1292-1301, p. 872
[4] Sharp, J.E.E.S. (ed.), Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem, vol. V, Edward II (Liechtenstein, 1973), no. 390
[5] Morris, G.J. & Rodney, H. (eds.), Calendar of Inquisitions Miscellaneous, volume 1 (London, 1916), no. 1493
[7] Sharp, J.E.E.S. (ed.), Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem, vol. 1, Henry III (Liechtenstein, 1973), no. 744
[8] Sharp, J.E.E.S. (ed.), Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem, vol. III, Edward 1 (Liechtenstein, 1973), no. 604 (p. 477)
[9] Morris, G.J. & Rodney, H. (eds.), Calendar of Inquisitions Miscellaneous, volume 1 (London, 1916), no. 1493
[10] Morris, G.J. & Rodney, H. (eds.), Calendar of Inquisitions Miscellaneous, volume 1 (London, 1916), no. 1493
[11] Calendar of Patent Rolls, Edward 1, 1301-1307, p. 280
[12] Sharp, J.E.E.S. (ed.), Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem, vol. IV, Edward 1 (Liechtenstein, 1973), no. 434 (p. 301)
[13] Sharp, J.E.E.S. (ed.), Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem, vol. V, Edward II (Liechtenstein, 1973), no. 390
[14] Sharp, J.E.E.S. (ed.), Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem, vol. II, Edward 1 (Liechtenstein, 1973), nos. 10, 127
[15] Morris, G.J. & Rodney, H. (eds.), Calendar of Inquisitions Miscellaneous, volume 1 (London, 1916), no. 1493
[16] Sharp, J.E.E.S. (ed.), Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem, vol. IV, Edward 1 (Liechtenstein, 1973), no. 434 (p. 301)
[18] Sharp, J.E.E.S. (ed.), Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem, vol. V, Edward II (Liechtenstein, 1973), no. 390
[19] Morris, G.J. & Rodney, H. (eds.), Calendar of Inquisitions Miscellaneous, volume 1 (London, 1916), no. 1493
[21] Calendar of Patent Rolls, Edward 1, 1281-1292, p. 406
[22] Sharp, J.E.E.S. (ed.), Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem, vol. III, Edward 1 (Liechtenstein, 1973), no. 604 (p. 477)
[23] Calendar of Patent Rolls, Edward 1, 1301-1307, p. 280
[24] Sharp, J.E.E.S. (ed.), Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem, vol. V, Edward II (Liechtenstein, 1973), no. 390
[25] Sharp, J.E.E.S. (ed.), Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem, vol. 1, Henry III (Liechtenstein, 1973), no. 704
[26] Calendar of Patent Rolls, Edward 1, 1301-1307, p. 280
[27] Calendar of Close Rolls, Edward 1, 1301-1307, p. 294
[28] Sharp, J.E.E.S. (ed.), Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem, vol. IV, Edward 1 (Liechtenstein, 1973), no. 434 (p. 300)
[29] Sharp, J.E.E.S. (ed.), Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem, vol. V, Edward II (Liechtenstein, 1973), no. 390
[30] Sharp, J.E.E.S. (ed.), Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem, vol. 1, Henry III (Liechtenstein, 1973), nos. 282, 462
[31] Calendar of Close Rolls, Edward 1, 1288-1296, p. 92
[32] Morris, G.J. & Rodney, H. (eds.), Calendar of Inquisitions Miscellaneous, volume 1 (London, 1916), no. 1493
[33] Sharp, J.E.E.S. (ed.), Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem, vol. III, Edward 1 (Liechtenstein, 1973), no. 156 (p. 98)
[34] Sharp, J.E.E.S. (ed.), Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem, vol. III, Edward 1 (Liechtenstein, 1973), no. 423 (p. 308)
[35] Calendar of Patent Rolls, Edward 1, 1301-1307, p. 280
[36] Sharp, J.E.E.S. (ed.), Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem, vol. IV, Edward 1 (Liechtenstein, 1973), no. 434 (p. 300)
[37] Sharp, J.E.E.S. (ed.), Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem, vol. V, Edward II (Liechtenstein, 1973), no. 390
[38] Sharp, J.E.E.S. (ed.), Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem, vol. V, Edward II (Liechtenstein, 1973), no. 538 (p. 348)
[39] Calendar of Close Rolls, Edward 1, 1288-1296, p. 160
[40] Morris, G.J. & Rodney, H. (eds.), Calendar of Inquisitions Miscellaneous, volume 1 (London, 1916), no. 1493
[41] Calendar of Close Rolls, Edward 1, 1288-1296, p. 160
[42] Sharp, J.E.E.S. (ed.), Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem, vol. V, Edward II (Liechtenstein, 1973), no. 390
[43] Sharp, J.E.E.S. (ed.), Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem, vol. V, Edward II (Liechtenstein, 1973), no. 270 (p. 147)
[45] Sharp, J.E.E.S. (ed.), Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem, vol. V, Edward II (Liechtenstein, 1973), no. 270 (p. 147)
[46] Sharp, J.E.E.S. (ed.), Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem, vol. VI, Edward II (Liechtenstein, 1973), no. 705, 706
[49] Calendar of Patent Rolls, Edward 1, 1281-1292, p. 406
[50] Calendar of Patent Rolls, Edward 1, 1301-1307, p. 280
[51] Sharp, J.E.E.S. (ed.), Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem, vol. V, Edward II (Liechtenstein, 1973), no. 390
[53] Sharp, J.E.E.S. (ed.), Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem, vol. IV, Edward 1 (Liechtenstein, 1973), no. 461 (p. 345)
[54] Sharp, J.E.E.S. (ed.), Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem, vol. 1, Henry III (Liechtenstein, 1973), no. 586
[55] Gransden, A., A history of the Abbey of Bury St. Edmunds 1257-1301, Simon of Luton & John of Northwold (Woodbridge, 2015), p. 185
[56] Sharp, J.E.E.S. (ed.), Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem, vol. III, Edward 1 (Liechtenstein, 1973), no. 367 (p. 230)
[57] Sharp, J.E.E.S. (ed.), Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem, vol. V, Edward II (Liechtenstein, 1973), no. 390
[58] Sharp, J.E.E.S. (ed.), Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem, vol. VI, Edward II (Liechtenstein, 1973), no. 705, 706
[60] Sharp, J.E.E.S. (ed.), Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem, vol. V, Edward II (Liechtenstein, 1973), no. 390
[62] Calendar of Close Rolls, Edward 1, 1288-1296, pp. 106, 107
[63] Calendar of Patent Rolls, Edward 1, 1301-1307, p. 280
[64] Sharp, J.E.E.S. (ed.), Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem, vol. VI, Edward II (Liechtenstein, 1973), no. 227
[65] Sharp, J.E.E.S. (ed.), Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem, vol. V, Edward II (Liechtenstein, 1973), no. 390
[66] Calendar of Close Rolls, Edward 1, 1279-1288, p. 175
[67] Calendar of Patent Rolls, Edward 1, 1301-1307, p. 280