Showing posts with label Sodbury. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Sodbury. Show all posts

Tuesday, January 9, 2018

Sodbury manor and the market town of Chipping Sodbury

Sodbury manor and the market town of Chipping Sodbury

Niall C.E.J. O’Brien

Chipping Sodbury is a market town in south Gloucestershire about 14 miles north-east of Bristol. Before the Norman Conquest Old Sodbury which included the later borough of Chipping Sodbury, was owned by Brictric son of Algar. By the time of the Domesday Survey in 1086 the king held Sodbury.[1]

Sodbury under the Crassus family

By the early years of the 13th century Sodbury came to the Crassus family and the character of Sodbury manor changed forever. William Crassus had married a sister of William Marshal and was the father of five sons the eldest two of whom were named William Craasus the elder and William Crassus the younger. It was William Crassus the elder who got the charter for the market at Sodbury in 1218 and in 1224 was made seneschal of Leinster in Ireland for his uncle, William Marshal.[2] The borough of Chipping Sodbury was created on a virgin site according to the research of Maurice Beresford, one of the few such medieval towns in Gloucestershire, in the first twenty years of the 13th century.[3]

The name of Chipping Sodbury translates as ‘market place of the new town’ and the market was an important feature in the new town.[4] On 12th August 1218 Henry III allowed William Crassus to have a Monday market at Chipping Sodbury.[5] On 24th May 1227 Henry III granted a charter for a Thursday market at Chipping Sodbury while at the same time granting an annual fair on the Nativity of John the Baptist (24th June) for three days.[6]

The market and fair at Chipping Sodbury, like at other towns across the country, provided the main venue for the purchase and sale of goods in the medieval period. The weekly market was geared for local trade while the annual fair (usually held over three days) provided access to the regional trade routes.[7]

Market area of Chipping Sodbury

Records across the ages give us a glimpse of the burgage plots and the burgesses who made the new town home. In 1255 Muriel de Kidderminster acted as plaintiff in a case of mort d’ancestor for a burgage plot in Chipping Sodbury against Philip de Patepull and Alice, daughter of Geoffrey de Lyegrove. Muriel remised and quitclaimed the plot to Philip and Alice in consideration of 46s 8d.[8] It would appear that most of the burgage plots in Chipping Sodbury were laid out in a regular size with 33 feet fronting the High Street as the norm such as the grants by Adam of Horwood, and John Brown, burgesses of Chipping Sodbury in the 14th century.[9]

Sodbury under the Weyland family

By 1270 Sodbury had passed from the Crassus family to that of Weyland. On 6th November 1270 Henry III granted a charter to William de Weyland to hold a Monday market at Chipping Sodbury and an annual fair on 29th August. In 1280 the old date of 24th June was restored for the holding of the annual fair.[10]

In 1276 John de Brandeston and Marsilia, his wife and former wife of William de Weyland, claimed a third part of Sodbury as her dower against Thomas Weyland (brother of William) and other property. In court Marsilia gave up the claim for a third of Sodbury in exchange for the manor of Middleton in Suffolk.[11] For an account of the Weyland estates in Suffolk see http://celtic2realms-medievalnews.blogspot.ie/2017/08/john-de-weyland-estate-in-1312-suffolk.html  

In 1278 Geoffrey de Aspale granted Sodbury manor to Thomas Weyland, Margery, his wife and Richard their son to hold for the lives of Thomas and Margery with remainder to Richard and his heirs.[12] On 15th November 1280 Edward I granted a charter for a Thursday market at Chipping Sodbury to Thomas Weyland.[13] In July 1290 King Edward instructed the sheriff of Gloucester to return Sodbury manor to Margery and Richard after it was taken into the king’s hand due to the felony of Thomas Weyland. The king had inspected the charter of Geoffrey de Aspale and was satisfied with its contents. But by November 1290, Margery and Richard Weyland had to appoint Robert de Denham and Thomas his brother as attorneys to demand against the king in the king’s own court for the return of Sodbury manor. Thomas Weyland had fled the country because of a felony and the king had seized Sodbury. In March 1291 the king ordered the sheriff of Gloucester to restore Sodbury to Margery and Richard.[14]

Meanwhile in 1283 Thomas Weyland granted property in Ireland to William le Gras, which William formerly held from William de Weyland, in exchange for William le Gras acknowledging that Sodbury belonged to Thomas Weyland, his wife Margery and their son Richard.[15]

Sodbury under the Earls of Gloucester

In January 1296 it was found that Gilbert de Clare, Earl of Gloucester and Hertford held the manor of Sodbury with two parks containing 69 acres and a quarter of the salt receivable at Wych (worth 16d). There were also gardens, dovecotes, two mills, 454 acres of arable land in demesne with pasture, meadow, villeinage and cottars with rents from free tenants and assizes. There was also 2s 6d from Netepeny while the assize rents of Chipping Sodbury were £9 11s 7d. The Earl also had the toll of the market and fair at Chipping Sodbury which was held jointly with his wife Joan, daughter of King Edward. The market was worth 40s per year. The heirs of William Crassus held one knight’s fee at Sodbury while the total value of the manor was £41 5s 5d.[16]

On 24th May 1307 a detailed inquisition post mortem was made concerning Sodbury. It found the manor contained, with other property, about 600 arable areas, two water mills, two dovecotes, pasture and meadow along with a deer park and a park without deer at La Leigrave along with a tenement at Bridehwike.[17] In May 1228 the area around Sodbury was excluded from the royal forest of Horwood with a right to possess deer independent of the royal deer.[18] In 1303 some persons unknown took some deer in the park belonging to John de Wylyngton near Yate-by-Sodbury.[19] In 1310 other people illegally entered the deer parks of Gilbert de Clare at Sodbury while the property was in the king’s hand.[20] In 1307 the whole manor of Sodbury was worth £49 6s 7d including Chipping Sodbury, free tenants and villeins.[21] The whole manor was held by Joan de Clare, daughter of King Edward I and wife of the late Gilbert de Clare, Earl of Gloucester and Hertford. Gilbert de Clare had Sodbury jointly with his wife in chief of the king by the service of one knight’s fee. Gilbert de Clare, then aged seventeen years, was her son and heir.[22]

By 1307 the market town of Chipping Sodbury had 90 burgesses holding 176 burger plots and paying £9 14s 1½d per year. In 1307 the fair day was held on the Nativity of St. John the Baptist. The value of the fair is unknown as the inquisition document was damaged at that point but we do known that the toll of the market was worth 30s while the market town with pleas and perquisites of the manor was worth £15 7s 2d.[23] It appears that the value of the market at Chipping Sodbury had declined by a quarter in the eleven years between 1296 and 1307.

In 1322 William Aylmer was appointed to keep and survey the wainage and stock of Sodbury manor and numerous other places in Gloucestershire, Oxfordshire and Worcestershire and was later joined by John de Donestable to share the workload.[24]

Sodbury under the Despenser family

By the 1330s Sodbury had come under the control of the le Despenser family, the power brokers behind King Edward II. On 30th June 1337 Eleanor, wife of the late Hugh le Despenser, died. She held at the time of her death various property in Oxfordshire, Worcestershire and Gloucestershire (Tewkesbury, Stoke Orchard, Fairford and Sodbury). At Sodbury she had the manor with the deer park and two fairs in Chipping Sodbury and the market. The manor was held of the king in chief by the service of one knight’s fee. Hugh le Despenser, her first born son, was her heir and was aged about twenty-nine years old.[25]

Elsewhere we are told that the capital messuage at Sodbury was worth nothing because the house cost more to upkeep than what it yielded. There was a dovecote worth 3s 4d and a windmill just worth 6s 6d as it was in a bad state of repair. There was 460 acres of arable land of which 307 acres was sold before Eleanor’s death for 102s 4d. The remaining arable land was in fallow. There was 50 acres of pasture worth 12s 6d and a park for wild animals. The rent of the assizes was worth £11 14s 10¾d per year. The pleas and perquisites of the court was 10s per year and there were 15 customary tenants.[26]

The poor and rundown state of the manor of Sodbury is contrasted by the growth of the borough of Chipping Sodbury. By 1337 there were two fairs Chipping Sodbury at the feasts of the Ascension and the Nativity of St. John the Baptist along with the market. The Ascension fair was worth 30s and that of St. John the Baptist 40s while the toll of the market was 5s. The growth in the town is reflected in the rent of the burgesses of Chipping Sodbury which increased from £9 14s 1½d in 1307 to £9 18s 6½d in 1337.[27]

Sodbury fair

In April 1344 Hugh le Despenser appealed leave to the king to grant the manor of Sodbury to three clerks in trust, Edmund de Grymesby, John le Hamslape and William de Oseberstone. It was stated that Hugh le Despenser held Sodbury from the Earl of Gloucester by the service of receiving the Earl at the west side of the manor and escorting him to the east side. The jury of the inquisition taken at Sodbury found it no damage to the king if the clerks granted Sodbury to Hugh le Despenser and his wife Elizabeth. The manor was at that time worth £50. In June 1344 the king allowed the enfeoffment.[28] 

Alina, late the wife of Sir Edward Burnel died on 16th May 1363. An inquisition post mortem, made at Sodbury, found that she held the manor of Sodbury for life of the king in chief by one knight’s fee as a gift from Hugh le Despenser. The borough of Chipping Sodbury had two fairs per year, at the feasts of the Invention of the Holy Cross and the Nativity of St. John the Baptist. The manor of Sodbury reverted to Edward le Despenser, kinsman of Hugh le Despenser, on the death of Alina Burnel.[29] Sir Edward Burnel had died in 1316 to be succeeded by his sister Matilda, wife of John Lovel.[30]

Sir Edward le Despenser died on 12th November 1375 leaving his two year old son, Thomas le Despenser, as heir. Sir Edward le Despenser held the manor of Sodbury in Gloucestershire with the borough of Chipping Sodbury of the king in chief. The manor included a pasture called Mansedmede and a close called Leigrave along with a deer park. There were at that time two fairs in Chipping Sodbury at the feasts of the Ascension and St. John the Baptist.[31]

In 1378 Isabel, wife of Edward le Despenser, was instructed to pay David Hunt 2d (pence) per day as keeper of Sodbury park for life as long as the park remained in the king’s hand.[32]

Sodbury in the fifteenth century

In 1405 Richard Mawerdyn was appointed by the king as steward and parker at Sodbury which was then in the king’s hand owing to the minority of Lord le Despenser.[33] In April 1405 King Henry IV granted the manor of Sodbury and the borough of Chipping Sodbury to his wife, Queen Joan.[34] By the 1430s Chipping Sodbury had been restored to the le Despenser family in the name of Isabel, Countess of Warwick and daughter of Thomas Lord Despenser.[35]

For an account of inquisitions post mortem taken at Chipping Sodbury between 1419 and 1422 see http://celtic2realms-medievalnews.blogspot.ie/2014/12/inquisitions-post-mortem-at-chipping.html

Sodbury in the sixteenth and seventeenth century

But by 1522 Sodbury was back in royal hands. In the 1522 military survey there were about 77 financial contributors to the military fund from Chipping Sodbury. Eight of these people were weavers while others included a cordwainer, tailor, and shoemaker. Sir Anthony Poyntz was then steward of the town.[36]

Chipping Sodbury was still listed as a market town in about 1600 but by then its fortunes appear to have declined somewhat. Although in the sixteenth century the town and surrounding area sent apprentices to Bristol, no apprentices were sent to Oxford and in the seventeenth century no apprentices went to Gloucester.[37] There is equally no reference to Chipping Sodbury among the inquisitions post mortem taken in the reign of King Charles the First.[38]

Sodbury in modern times

By the nineteenth century Chipping Sodbury was noted as an ancient market town with a population in 1870 of 1,112 people. The trade of the town was then chiefly in cheese and malt.[39] In 1870 there was a market on the first Tuesday of every month and two annual fairs, Holy Thursday and 24th June.[40] Until the 1950s Chipping Sodbury was still a relatively small town serving as a market town for the surrounding area but since then the motor car has made the town in a large commercial and commuter town for Bristol.

In 1974 Chipping Sodbury was taken from Gloucestershire and made part of the new county of Avon. But in 1996 Chipping Sodbury returned to the ceremonial county of Gloucestershire with the abolition of Avon as a county to be part of the unitary authority of South Gloucestershire. In 2001 Chipping Sodbury was still described as a market town with 5,066 people but since then the town has become part of the larger urban area of Yate with a combined population of over 26,000.[41]

===============

End of post

===============




[1] Taylor, C., An analysis of the Domesday Survey of Gloucestershire (Bristol, 1889), pp. 190, 300, 301
[2] Brooks, E. St. John, Knights’ Fees in Counties Wexford, Carlow and Kilkenny in 13th to 15th Century (Stationery Office, Dublin, 1950), pp. 72, 73
[3] Herbert, N., ‘Northleach: New Light on the Making of a Gloucestershire Town’, in Bettey, J. (ed.), Archives & Local History in Bristol & Gloucestershire: Essays in Honour of David Smith (Bristol & Gloucestershire Archaeological Society, 2007), pp. 17-26, at p. 19
[4] Baddeley, W. St. Clair, Gloucestershire Place-names (Gloucester, 1913), pp. 42, 143
[7] Kowaleski, M., Local Markets and Regional Trade in Medieval Exeter (Cambridge, 1995), p. 41
[8] Elrington, C.R. (ed.), Abstracts of feet of fines relating to Gloucestershire 1199-1299 (Bristol & Gloucestershire Archaeological Society, Gloucestershire Record Series, vol. 16, 2003), no. 561
[9] Walker, D. (ed.), The Cartulary of St. Augustine’s Abbey, Bristol (Bristol & Gloucestershire Archaeological Society, Gloucestershire Record Series, Vol. 10, 1998), add. doc. nos. 26, 27
[11] Elrington, C.R. (ed.), Abstracts of feet of fines relating to Gloucestershire 1199-1299 (Bristol & Gloucestershire Archaeological Society, Gloucestershire Record Series, vol. 16, 2003), no. 810
[12] Elrington, C.R. (ed.), Abstracts of feet of fines relating to Gloucestershire 1199-1299 (Bristol & Gloucestershire Archaeological Society, Gloucestershire Record Series, vol. 16, 2003), no. 817
[14] Calendar of Close Rolls, Edward I, 1288-1296, pp. 96, 147, 163
[15] Elrington, C.R. (ed.), Abstracts of feet of fines relating to Gloucestershire 1199-1299 (Bristol & Gloucestershire Archaeological Society, Gloucestershire Record Series, vol. 16, 2003), no. 855
[16] Madge, S.J. (ed.), Abstracts of Inquisitions Post Mortem for Gloucestershire, Part IV, 20 Henry III to 29 Edward I, 1236-1300 (London, 1903), pp. 183, 184; Sharp, J.E.E.S. (ed.), Calendar of Inquisitions post mortem preserved in the Public Record Office, Vol. III, Edward 1 (Kraus reprint, 1973), no. 371
[17] Fry, E.A. (ed.), Abstracts of Inquisitions Post Mortem for Gloucestershire, part V, 30 Edward I to 32 Edward III, 1302-1358 (British Record Society, London, 1910), pp. 81, 82, 83, 84, 85
[18] Dryburgh, P. & Hartland, B. (ed.), Calendar of the Fine Rolls of the Reign of Henry III, volume II, 9 to 18 Henry III, 1224-1234 (London, 2008), nos. 12/171, 14/177
[19] Calendar of Patent Rolls, Edward I, 1303-1307, p. 184
[20] Calendar of Patent Rolls, Edward II, 1307-1313, p. 261
[21] Fry (ed.), Abstracts of Inquisitions Post Mortem for Gloucestershire, part V, 1302-1358, p. 85
[22] Sharp (ed.), Calendar of Inquisitions post mortem, Vol. IV, Edward 1, no. 435
[23] Fry (ed.), Abstracts of Inquisitions Post Mortem for Gloucestershire, part V, 1302-1358, pp. 84, 85
[24] Calendar of Patent Rolls, Edward III, 1321-1324, pp. 112, 118
[25] Sharp (ed.), Calendar of Inquisitions post mortem, Vol. VIII, Edward II1, no. 132
[26] Fry, E.A. (ed.), Abstracts of Inquisitions Post Mortem for Gloucestershire, part V, 30 Edward I to 32 Edward III, 1302-1358 (British Record Society, London, 1910), p. 265
[27] Fry, E.A. (ed.), Abstracts of Inquisitions Post Mortem for Gloucestershire, part V, 30 Edward I to 32 Edward III, 1302-1358 (British Record Society, London, 1910), p. 265
[28] Fry (ed.), Abstracts of Inquisitions Post Mortem for Gloucestershire, part V, 1302-1358, pp. 303, 304; Calendar of Patent Rolls, Edward III, 1343-1345, p. 268
[29] Dawes, C.B. & others (eds.), Calendar of Inquisitions post mortem preserved in the Public Record Office, Vol. XI, Edward II1 (Kraus reprint, 1973), no. 489
[30] Fry (ed.), Abstracts of Inquisitions Post Mortem for Gloucestershire, part V, 1302-1358, pp. 156, 157
[31] Chapman, J.B.W. & Dawes, C.B. (eds.), Calendar of Inquisitions post mortem preserved in the Public Record Office, Vol. XIV, Edward II1 (Kraus reprint, 1986), no. 209
[32] Calendar of Close Rolls, Richard II, 1377-1383, p. 49
[33] Calendar of Patent Rolls, Henry IV, 1401-1405, p. 494
[34] Calendar of Patent Rolls, Henry IV, 1405-1408, p. 4
[35] Noble, C. (ed.), Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem, volume XXV, 16 to 20 Henry VI, 1437-1442 (London, 2009), nos. 310, 330
[36] Hoyle, R.W. (ed.), The military survey of Gloucestershire, 1522 (Bristol & Gloucestershire Archaeological Society, Gloucestershire Record Series, Vol. 6, 1993), p. 3
[37] Hollis, D. (ed.), Calendar of the Bristol Apprentice Book, 1532-1565, Part I, 1532-1542 (Bristol Record Society, Vol. XIV, 1948), Ms. p. 94, 165, 212; Ralph, E. & Hardwick, N.M. (eds.), Calendar of the Bristol Apprentice Book, 1532-1565, Part II, 1542-1552 (Bristol Record Society, Vol. XXXIII, 1980), nos. 262, 644, 647, 871, 1235, 1295, 1376, 1740; Ralph, E. (ed.), Calendar of the Bristol Apprentice Book, 1532-1565, Part III, 1552-1565 (Bristol Record Society, Vol. XLIII, 1992), nos. 27, 65, 703; Crossley, A. (ed.), Oxford City Apprentices, 1513-1602 (Oxford Historical Society, New Series, Vol. XLIV, 2012); Barlow, J. (ed.), A calendar of the registers of Apprentice of the city of Gloucester, 1595-1700 (Bristol & Gloucestershire Archaeological Society, Gloucestershire Record Series, Vol. 14, 2001);
[38] Fry, E.A. (ed.), Abstracts of Gloucestershire Inquisitions Post Mortem in the reign of Charles the First, 1625-1642 (London, 1899)
[39] Anon, The National Encyclopedia (13 vols. London, 1870), vol. 6, p. 825

Monday, December 29, 2014

Inquisitions post mortem at Chipping Sodbury in Gloucestershire, 1419-1422

Inquisitions post mortem at
Chipping Sodbury in Gloucestershire, 1419-1422

Niall C.E.J. O’Brien

Introduction

This article about seven seemingly unconnected inquisitions post mortem made at Chipping Sodbury between 1419 and 1422 started life as a piece of secondary research where the primary research was to find who owned the three adjunct places of Chipping Sodbury, Old Sodbury and Little Sodbury. The last place was where William Tyndale spent two years teaching the children of Sir John Walsh. One of the places called Sodbury was once owned by the family of Weyland (which family held land in medieval Ireland) and it was to find which Sodbury that this article had its origin. As the article took shape, the seven separate inquisitions began to make connections to each other, and in such way showed some of the connections among the landed gentry of Gloucestershire that formed not just in that county but carried itself across western England and into south Wales.

Chipping Sodbury

The three places of Sodbury, i.e., Chipping Sodbury, Old Sodbury and Little Sodbury lie about the summit of a hill called Old Sodbury. Upon this hill is an old Roman fort from which the area takes its name. Sodbury lies some four miles east of Yate which latter place is ten miles north-east of Bristol.[1]

Chipping Sodbury is only about two miles from Little Sodbury yet its history is distinct from the latter place. Together with Old Sodbury, the area of Chipping Sodbury formed the large estate of Britric, Earl of Gloucester in the time of Edward the Confessor.[2] Chipping Sodbury was a new town, built on a virgin site, in the time of Henry III; one of only two such new towns built in Gloucestershire.[3] The name of Chipping Sodbury translates as ‘market place of Sodbury’ and the market was here established in the time of Henry III. The founder of Chipping Sodbury was William Crassus who married a sister of William Marshal. William Crassus had five sons the eldest two of which were named William Craasus the elder and William Crassus the younger. It was William Crassus the elder who got the charter for the market at Sodbury in 1217 and in 1224 was seneschal of Leinster in Ireland for his uncle, William Marshal.[4]

John Devereux inquisition

The first inquisition post-mortem was held at Chipping Sodbury on 9th November 1419 into the property held by the late John Deverose (Devereux) in Gloucestershire. It found he held the manor of Oldland of the king in chief and two other portions of land there of the Earl of Stafford and the Abbot of Keynesham. John Devereux died on 25th September 1419 and was succeeded by his daughter Joan, wife of John Chesebrok.[5] John Devereux also held a manor in Dorset for life by an inquisition held at Sherborne on the same day.[6]

In 1385 Cecilia, daughter and heir (since the death of her brother John in 1349) of William de la More granted half the manor of Bitton called Oldland to Sir John Devereux of Staundon and Joan is wife. Cecilia de la More was married to Nicholas de Berkeley of Dursley who died without issue in 1382.[7]

The connections of business and friendship between the Gloucestershire gentry appear in the life of Sir John Devereux. In November 1407 Sir John Devereux appeared as a witness to a land deed concerning property in Bitton. Sir Gilbert Denys was also a witness to this same deed and his inquisition post mortem at Chipping Sodbury appears at the end of this article.[8]

William Gamage inquisition

On 30th October 1419 an inquisition post mortem was held at Chipping Sodbury into the property of the late Sir William Gamage. Sir William Gamage died on 27th September 1419 and was succeeded by his son Thomas Gamage who was about fifteen years old. The inquisition found that William Gamage held the whole, or part of, seven different properties in Wales in what are now Glamorganshire and Monmouthshire.[9] One of these places, West End in Caldicot, was acquired by William’s father, Gilbert Gamage in 1381 by grant of King Richard II. The then occupant, Sir John de Sapy, had a grant of the manor for life but was forced to surrender this to Gilbert Gamage.[10]

But the inquisition post mortem of 30th October 1419 was not thorough enough. A second inquisition was held at Tewkesbury on 9th October 1420 which found as in the previous inquisition but with the addition of land at Newcastle in the march which was held of the Earl of Worcester.[11]

But these two inquisitions did not tell the full story and so a third inquisition into the property of Sir William Gamage was held on 18th September 1421 at Chipping Sodbury. This inquisition increased the value of Rogeat from 100s to 200s and stated that William died on 23rd August 1419. The inquisition was found that since the death of Sir William that his two landlords, the Earls of Worcester and of March had both entered into their respective properties and were taking the profits while Gamage’s heir was still a minor.[12]

The proof of age of Thomas Gamage, son of William Gamage, taken on 10th January 1430 stated that Thomas Gamage was born at Rogiet and was baptised at Rogiet church. It also said that Gilbert Gamage was the father of William Gamage and grandfather of Thomas Gamage.[13]

In 1397 William Gamage, esquire, was in the army of Roger Mortimer in Ireland and in July 1397 was given licence to remain in Ireland for one year.[14] Roger Mortimer was then Lieutenant of Ireland and had first sailed to Ireland in September 1394 in the company of King Richard II. It is possible that William Gamage also went at that time. Roger Mortimer remained in Ireland after Richard left. Roger Mortimer was in England at the start of 1397 and returned to Ireland after July 1397 with William Gamage. In a battle with the O’Byrnes at Kellistown near Carlow on 20th July 1398 Roger Mortimer was killed and the vast Mortimer estate fell to the king as Mortimer’s heir was only seven years old.[15] It is not known when William Gamage returned to England.

In 1412 a business of war connection was made between William Gamage and Sir Gilbert Denys (his inquisition post mortem appears below). The two men assembled an armed force (described as “no moderate multitude of armed men”) and went to the castle of Coity (Glamorganshire) in Wales where they proceeded to besiege the castle. Their purpose was to expel Joan, wife of the late Richard Vernon. On 16th September 1412 King Henry IV commissioned William Newport and five other men to assemble a force and “quietly” go to Coity and raise the siege. William Newport was to cause nobody to lay siege upon Coity and any claimant were to seek redress through the courts.[16]

It is not clear if William Newport was able to raise the siege but he was unsuccessful in the long run as William Gamage held the castle of Coity and two thirds of the manor at the time of his death in 1419.[17]

Margaret Blaket inquisition

On 24th January 1421 an inquisition post mortem was held at Chipping Sodbury into the property of Margaret, wife of Sir John Blaket who survived her. Margaret Blaket had died on 8th August 1420. The inquisition found she held the manor of Didmarten for life, worth 4 marks, and that it was held in reversion to John, son and heir of William Worston and the said John Worston was her son by her first husband. Margaret Blaket also held various properties in Somerset of different landlords by inquisitions held in that county. Margaret Blaket also had a son by John Blaket called Edmund Blaket.[18]

Sir John Blaket died on 24th June 1430 leaving Edmund Blaket as his son and heir without any property in Gloucestershire. Edmund Blaket was then about eighteen years old.[19]

Chipping Sodbury

John Bowelers inquisition

On 12th August 1420 John Bowelers, esquire, died and on 20th May 1421 an inquisition post mortem was held at Chipping Sodbury into his property. It found he held land at Magor of the king but in right of his late wife, Joan. Two further properties were also held the Earl Marshal in right of the late Joan Bowelers. John Bowelers had three further properties in Wales from the Earl of March. John Bowelers was succeeded by his son Ralph Bowelers who was about fourteen years old.[20] 

Following the death of John Bowelers and during the minority of Ralph Bowelers, the King took the issues of Magor while the Earl Marshal took the issues of Penhow and Portskewett. Edmund, Earl of March took the issues of Whitson, Rogerstone and Redcastle and after his death, his wife, Countess Anne took the issues.[21]

The proof of age of Ralph Bowelers was taken on 13th November 1429 at Gloucester. It said that Ralph was born at Penhow in the March of Wales and was baptised in Penhow church. One of the witnesses, John Sweyn, was married on the day of Ralph’s baptism in Rogiet church where Thomas Gamage was baptised.[22]

Isabel de la Mare inquisition

On 14th February 1422 an inquisition post mortem at Chipping Sodbury found that the late widow, Isabel de la Mare (died 17th September), held one third of the manor of Westbury on Severn for life. The manor was previously granted to Isabel and her then husband, Richard de la Mare, along with three other men by John Mellebourne, son of Peter Mellebourne. On the death of Isabel the three remaining leasers granted the manor to John Mellebourne and his wife, Elizabeth.[23]

One of these three other men was John Merbury of Herefordshire. The various connections of friendship and business surround the people associated with Isabel de la Mare. In August 1420 Richard de la Mare and John Mellebourne appear as witnesses to a deed whereby John Merbury granted the manor of Talgarth in Wales to three trustees.[24] In January 1413 John’s wife Agnes, Lady of Weobley, attended the baptism of John Barre (kinsman of Isabel de la Mare) as his godmother. Lady Agnes rode to Rotherwas church with two male servants, John de Eye and William de Huntyton. These two men were witnesses to the proof of age of John Barre in 1433.[25]

Lady Agnes Merbury died on 3rd February 1436 leaving various lands in Lincolnshire, Herefordshire, Bedfordshire, Shropshire, Nottinghamshire and Leicestershire. We are old that Walter Devereux as her kin and heir. This Walter Devereux was the son of Walter Devereux, son of Agnes by her first marriage.[26] In August 1429 John Merbury and Lady Agnes along with four others, including John Devereux, granted Talgarth to James de Berkeley, lord of Berkeley.[27] It is presumed that this John Devereux was a relation of Lady Agnes by her first marriage. It is as yet too speculative to say if this John Devereux was any relation of the John Devereux who was the subject of the inquisition post mortem at Chipping Sodbury in November 1419 noted above.  

Isabel de le Mare was previously married to Sir John Eynesford of Tillington and John Barre, son of Sir Thomas Barre junior, was her kinsman and next heir. This John Bare was about eight years old in 1422.[28] The proof of age of John Barre, son of Sir Thomas Barre junior, son of Thomas Barre senior, was made on 1st May 1435 at Hereford. The proof said that John Barre was born at Rotherwas on 31st January 1413 and was baptised in the local church of St. Mary by the Bishop of Hereford (by the prior of Hereford said another witness).[29]

Isabel de la Mare also held various properties in Herefordshire where William Bourghull was her next heir. Many of these Herefordshire properties were from her first husband, Sir John Eynesford and reverted on her death to John Mellebourne and his wife, Elizabeth.[30] When John Milbourne, esquire, died on 12th September 1436 he was seized of various lands in Lincolnshire, Herefordshire and Westbury on Severn in Gloucestershire (he also held Bollow manor by a separate land deed). John Milbourne was survived by his wife Elizabeth and their year old son, Simon Milbourne.[31]

Cecily Thorp inquisition

On 30th April 1422 an inquisition into the property of Cecily, widow of Henry Thorp, esquire, was held at Chipping Sodbury. Her husband, Henry Thorp, had died on 11th October 1416 leaving land in Devon, Wiltshire and Oldbury in Gloucestershire. Thomas Thorp was his son and heir and was aged about seventeen years.[32] Thomas Thorp failed to come into his inheritance as on 5th October 1419 he died leaving Agnes his wife as a widow and his inheritance to his younger brother, Ralph Thorp. Agnes Thorp didn’t long survive her husband as she died on 27th November 1419 leaving her brother William Bonham as heir.[33] Cecily Thorp was left to take the profits of the family estate during the minority of Thomas Thorp and after.[34]

On 20th March 1422 Thomas’s mother, Cecily Thorp, died thus leaving a son, Ralph Thorp as her heir and that of her late son. Ralph Thorp was twenty years old on 11th November 1421. Cecily Thorp held the manor of Oldbury on the Hill for life. On her death, her executors were to use the revenues of the manor to pay her debts and the debts of her late husband whose executor she was. If anything was left it should go to Ralph Thorp but the executors still held it at the time of the inquisition post mortem.[35] Cecily Thorp also held lands in Devon and Wiltshire which were formerly held by her husband, Henry Thorp.[36]

It was later found that the inquisitions taken in Wiltshire concerning Cecily’s estates were incomplete. On 10th April 1423 another inquisition was made which exposed lands at Newton Toney and Allington.[37]

The proof of age of Ralph Thorp was taken on 15th May 1423 in which we are told he was born and baptised at Oldbury on the Hill.[38] Ralph Thorp married a girl called Philippa and they had a son called John born about 1432. Philippa Thorp died before her husband and Ralph Thorp married again to a girl called Alice. On 3rd October 1446 Ralph Thorp died.[39]

The inquisition post mortem taken at Gloucester on 4th May 1447 said that Joan, the wife of John Burdon, was Ralph’s great-grandmother and that Joan was held the manor of Oldbury on the Hill. Joan Burdon granted the manor to trustees who in turn re-granted it to John Burdon and Joan. After John Burdon died, Joan granted Oldbury to Thomas de Berkeley, lord of Berkeley and eight other people to hold of their heirs. On 25th March 1447 the heirs granted Oldbury to Edmund Hungerford.[40] Apart from the grant of Oldbury to Thomas de Berkeley, there seems to be no obvious connection between Cecily Thorp and the other six inquisitions post mortem taken at Chipping Sodbury between 1419 and 1422.

Gilbert Denys inquisition

The last inquisition post mortem of 1419-1422 was that taken for Sir Gilbert Denys. On 25th June 1422 the inquisition post mortem was held at Chipping Sodbury. Sir Gilbert Denys had died on 24th March 1422 leaving Maurice Denys as his son and heir. This Maurice Denys was fourteen years old. Sir Gilbert Denys held the manors of Alveston and Earthcott of the king. Sir Gilbert Denys also held the manor and advowson of Olveston with his wife, Margaret Denys, who survived him. Olveston was to revert to Sir Gilbert’s kinsman, Nicholas Denys for life and then to the right heirs of Sir Gilbert.[41]

Sir Gilbert Denys was an important figure in the estate economy of fifteenth century Gloucestershire and beyond. As noted above he went to Coity Castle in Wales with William Gamage in 1412 with an armed force to lay siege to the place and evict a widow. In December 1390 Sir Gilbert Denys was first witness to the grant by William FitzWarin to Thomas de Berkeley, lord of Berkeley of land at Wixstowe in the hundred of Berkeley. In June 1417 Sir Gilbert and six others became trustees to the estates of Thomas de Berkeley, lord of Berkeley, in Gloucestershire, London, Somerset and Wiltshire.[42]

Sir Gilbert Denys’ son, Maurice Denys, continued the family association with the Berkeley family of Berkeley Castle. In 1466 he was witness to the grant in trust of Berkeley Castle by Thomas Stanley to various members of the Stanley and Berkeley families. Maurice Denys was witness to a later Berkeley deed in 1474 and was party with Maurice Berkeley to receive in 1450 the manor of Little Marshfield in Gloucestershire.[43]

The apparent unconnected families who had inquisitions post mortem made at Chipping Sodbury appear connected in other documents. In October 1463 Maurice Denys, esquire, was witness along with Sir John Barre (kinsman of Isabel de la Mare as noted above) to a grant of land in Clopton by James Berkeley to his son Thomas Berkeley.[44]

Conclusion

This article began life as a piece of secondary research on who owned which of the three adjunct places of Chipping Sodbury, Old Sodbury and Little Sodbury. It was hoped that soe of the seven inquisitions post mortem made at Chipping Sodbury between 1419 and 1422 may provide some information on ownership. But the seven inquisitions provided no such help. Instead they have taken on a life of their own by showing connections of family and business between some of them and connections with pace such as Rogiet for Gamage and Bowelers. Thus this article ends with seven, seemingly unconnected, inquisitions post mortem, having a nice few links of family, friendship, business and place connections.

================

End of post

================




[1] W. St. Clair Baddeley, Place-names of Gloucestershire (John Bellows, Gloucester, 1913), pp. 42, 143, 169;  John Taylor, ‘William Tyndale and Little Sodbury manor house’, in the Bristol Times and Mirror, 11th August 1883
[2] W.J. Robinson, West Country Churches (4 vols. Bristol Times & Mirror, 1915), vol. 3, p. 1
[3] Nicholas Herbert, ‘Northleach: New Light on the Making of a Gloucestershire Town’, in Joseph Betty (ed.), Archives & Local History in Bristol & Gloucestershire: Essays in Honour of David Smith (Bristol & Gloucestershire Archaeological Society, 2007), p. 19
[4] Eric St. John Brooks, Knights’ Fees in Counties Wexford, Carlow and Kilkenny in 13th to 15th Century (Stationery Office, Dublin, 1950), pp. 72, 73
[5] J.L. Kirby & Janet H. Stevenson (eds.), Calendar of inquisitions post mortem preserved in the Public Record Office, Vol. XXI, 6 to 10 Henry V, 1418-1422 (Boydell Press & National Archives, 2002), no. 281
[6] J.L. Kirby & J. Stevenson (eds.), Calendar of inquisitions post mortem, Vol. XXI, Henry V, 1418-1422, no. 282
[7] Bridget Wells-Furby (ed.), A catalogue of the medieval muniments at Berkeley Castle (2 vols. Bristol & Gloucestershire Archaeological Society, 2004), Vol. 2, p. 846n
[8] Bridget Wells-Furby (ed.), A catalogue of the medieval muniments at Berkeley Castle, Vol. 2, p. 840
[9] J.L. Kirby & J. Stevenson (eds.), Calendar of inquisitions post mortem, Vol. XXI, Henry V, 1418-1422, no. 303
[10] Calendar of Patent Rolls, Richard II, 1381-1385, pp. 608, 609
[11] J.L. Kirby & J. Stevenson (eds.), Calendar of inquisitions post mortem, Vol. XXI, Henry V, 1418-1422, no. 304
[12] J.L. Kirby & J. Stevenson (eds.), Calendar of inquisitions post mortem, Vol. XXI, Henry V, 1418-1422, no. 305
[13] Claire Noble (ed.), Calendar of inquisitions post mortem preserved in the Public Record Office, Vol. XXIII, 6 to 10 Henry VI, 1427-1432 (Boydell Press & National Archives, 2004), no. 417
[14] Calendar of Patent Rolls, Richard II, 1396-1399, p. 161
[15] A.J. Otway-Ruthven, History of medieval Ireland (Ernest Benn, London, 1980), pp. 326, 334, 336
[16] Calendar of Patent Rolls, Henry IV, 1408-1413, p. 433
[17] J.L. Kirby & J. Stevenson (eds.), Calendar of inquisitions post mortem, Vol. XXI, Henry V, 1418-1422, no. 303
[18] J.L. Kirby & J. Stevenson (eds.), Calendar of inquisitions post mortem, Vol. XXI, Henry V, 1418-1422, nos. 436, 437, 438, 439
[19] Claire Noble (ed.), Calendar of inquisitions post mortem, Vol. XXIII, Henry VI, 1427-1432, no. 429
[20] J.L. Kirby & J. Stevenson (eds.), Calendar of inquisitions post mortem, Vol. XXI, Henry V, 1418-1422, no. 703
[21] Claire Noble (ed.), Calendar of inquisitions post mortem, Vol. XXIII, Henry VI, 1427-1432, no. 364
[22] Claire Noble (ed.), Calendar of inquisitions post mortem preserved in the Public Record Office, Vol. XXIII, 6 to 10 Henry VI, 1427-1432, no. 423
[23] J.L. Kirby & J. Stevenson (eds.), Calendar of inquisitions post mortem, Vol. XXI, Henry V, 1418-1422, no. 772
[24] Bridget Wells-Furby (ed.), A catalogue of the medieval muniments at Berkeley Castle, Vol. 2, p. 669
[25] M.L. Holford, S.A. Mileson, C. Noble & Kate Parkin (eds.), Calendar of inquisitions post mortem preserved in the Public Record Office, Vol. XXIV, 11 to 15 Henry VI, 1432-1437 (Boydell Press & National Archives, 2010), no. 125
[26] M.L. Holford, S.A. Mileson, C. Noble & Kate Parkin (eds.), Calendar of inquisitions post mortem, Vol. XXIV, Henry VI, 1432-1437, nos. 474, 475, 476, 477, 478, 479
[27] Bridget Wells-Furby (ed.), A catalogue of the medieval muniments at Berkeley Castle, Vol. 2, pp. 669, 670
[28] J.L. Kirby & J. Stevenson (eds.), Calendar of inquisitions post mortem, Vol. XXI, Henry V, 1418-1422, no. 772
[29] M.L. Holford, S.A. Mileson, C. Noble & Kate Parkin (eds.), Calendar of inquisitions post mortem, Vol. XXIV, Henry VI, 1432-1437, no. 125
[30] J.L. Kirby & J. Stevenson (eds.), Calendar of inquisitions post mortem, Vol. XXI, Henry V, 1418-1422, no. 773
[31] M.L. Holford, S.A. Mileson, C. Noble & Kate Parkin (eds.), Calendar of inquisitions post mortem, Vol. XXIV, Henry VI, 1432-1437, nos. 624, 625, 626
[32] J.L. Kirby & J. Stevenson (eds.), Calendar of inquisitions post mortem, Vol. XXI, Henry V, 1418-1422, nos. 38-41
[33] Kate Parkin (ed.), Calendar of inquisitions post mortem preserved in the Public Record Office, Vol. XXII, 1 to 5 Henry VI, 1422-1427 (Boydell Press & National Archives, 2003), no. 161
[34] J.L. Kirby & J. Stevenson (eds.), Calendar of inquisitions post mortem, Vol. XXI, Henry V, 1418-1422, no. 42
[35] J.L. Kirby & J. Stevenson (eds.), Calendar of inquisitions post mortem, Vol. XXI, Henry V, 1418-1422, no. 928
[36] J.L. Kirby & J. Stevenson (eds.), Calendar of inquisitions post mortem, Vol. XXI, Henry V, 1418-1422, nos. 927, 929
[37] Kate Parkin (ed.), Calendar of inquisitions post mortem, Vol. XXII, Henry VI, 1422-1427, no. 160
[38] Kate Parkin (ed.), Calendar of inquisitions post mortem, Vol. XXII, Henry VI, 1422-1427, no. 226
[39] M.L. Holford (ed.), Calendar of inquisitions post mortem preserved in the Public Record Office, Vol. XXVI, 21 to 25 Henry VI, 1442-1447 (Boydell Press & National Archives, 2009), no. 519, 520, 521, 522, 523
[40] Kate Parkin (ed.), Calendar of inquisitions post mortem preserved in the Public Record Office, Vol. XXII, 1 to 5 Henry VI, 1422-1427 (Boydell Press & National Archives, 2003), no. 521
[41] J.L. Kirby & J. Stevenson (eds.), Calendar of inquisitions post mortem, Vol. XXI, Henry V, 1418-1422, no. 933
[42] Bridget Wells-Furby (ed.), A catalogue of the medieval muniments at Berkeley Castle, Vol. 1, pp. 258, 530
[43] Bridget Wells-Furby (ed.), A catalogue of the medieval muniments at Berkeley Castle, Vol. 1, pp. 6, 474, 492
[44] Bridget Wells-Furby (ed.), A catalogue of the medieval muniments at Berkeley Castle, Vol. 1, p. 232