Showing posts with label Margaret de Cormeilles. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Margaret de Cormeilles. Show all posts

Wednesday, February 12, 2014

Geoffrey of Crowcombe: a witness to early thirteenth century Ireland

Geoffrey of Crowcombe: a witness to early thirteenth century Ireland

Niall C.E.J. O’Brien

In a previous article we met a person called Geoffrey of Crowcombe who was the husband of Alice de Cormeilles, daughter of Walter de Cormeilles and sister of Margaret de Cormeilles. Here is a link to that article [article link = Margaret de Cormeilles and a miscarriage of justice]. In this article we explore the relationship, if any, that Geoffrey de Cormeilles had with Ireland. Let us first recount some of the information relating to Geoffrey from the previous article

Geoffrey of Crowcombe was an active person in the early years of the reign of Henry III. In June 1220 Geoffrey of Crowcombe was in Poitou on the king’s service and the sheriff of Gloucestershire was order to give respite to Geoffrey of Crowcombe for a demand of money because Geoffrey was out of the country. In May 1225 Geoffrey of Crowcombe was sent to France as an ambassador for Henry III. In 1229-30 he was assessor and collector of the tallage in Norfolk and Suffolk. About April 1230 Geoffrey was made sheriff of Oxfordshire. From October 1232 to March 1234 Geoffrey of Crowcombe was issuing royal writs on behalf of the king. In June 1234 Geoffrey was given custody of the royal manor of Woodstock (now Blenheim Palace) while continuing to hold the royal castle at Oxford.[1]

Geoffrey of Crowcombe and King John in Ireland

Yet long before we find information about Geoffrey of Crowcombe in England or France, his name appears in connection with Ireland. On 26th July 1210 a royal prest was made to Geoffrey of Crowcombe for 4 marks. This was made at Carrickfergus after its capture by King John.[2] The money from Geoffrey and many others was to fund King John in Ireland with a large army. The king was there because the three principle lords of Ireland, William Marshal (lord of Leinster); Walter de Lay (lord of Meath); and Hugh de Lacy (Earl of Ulster) were sheltering William de Braose (lord of Limerick). De Braose had entered a quarrel with King John over English affairs and had fled to Ireland. The justiciar, John de Grey, was ordered to arrest de Braose but, although de Grey was an experienced administrator and a person of remarkable ability, he was no match for the three lords.

Following the treaty with Scotland in 1209 King John was free to safely go to Ireland in 1210. He overran the lands of the three lords and besieged Hugh de Lacy and the de Braose family in Carrickfergus. After the castle fell the de Lacy brothers had fled overseas while William de Braose was in Wales since early summer.[3]

It seemed that all of the king’s campaigning across Ireland had missed its principal target. While at Carrickfergus King John was told that Duncan of Carrick had captured the wife and most of the family of William de Braose. Men-at-arms, archers and two wagons were immediately despatched to convey the prisoners to Carrickfergus. The two leaders of this force were John de Courcy and Geoffrey of Crowcombe. This is the first notice we have that Geoffrey was in Ireland at that time. John Gilbert does not tell us the source for Geoffrey of Crowcombe in Ireland but the story told by a Flemish chronicler would seem to be the source. The wife and son of de Braose were later left die of starvation at Windsor.[4]    

Carrickfergus Castle from Panoramia.com

Many years later, in October 1229, a number of people received pardons for money extracted from them to fund royal activities during the reign of King John in Ireland. Geoffrey of Crowcombe was pardoned for £11 16 shillings 8 pence which included a contribution to the Scottish war of the same period.[5] After nearly twenty years living with unpaid monies due to the government Geoffrey of Crowcombe must have been delighted with the news.

Geoffrey of Crowcombe comes to Ireland again

For the next decade from 1210 we hear no more of Geoffrey of Crowcombe and Ireland until October 1221. In that month Geoffrey de Marisco surrendered to Henry III all the king’s lands in Ireland and the office of justiciar. De Marisco was suspended as justiciar because he failed to resume royal lands sold by him or account for the royal revenues he received.[6]

Because royal castles could not be surrendered by messengers or letters, de Marisco sent over Roger Huscarl and David Basset. The king accepted the surrender of the castles and sent a directive to de Marisco to deliver the said castles to Henry, Archbishop of Dublin (the new justiciar) through the hands of Geoffrey of Crowcombe and Ralph of Norwich. To affect the transfer of the castles Geoffrey of Crowcombe and Ralph of Norwich were sent to Ireland and given 30 marks from the king’s treasury to cover their expenses.[7]

The rebellion of Hugh de Lacy

The de Lacy family had been flexing their military muscle in the early 1220s. in 1220 Walter de Lacy invaded the O’Reilly lands of Breifne – Cavan and Leitrim. In 1224 Walter’s brother, William de Lacy, attacked Breifne and lands of Cathal O’Connor, King of Connacht. Meanwhile negotiations for the restoration of the third brother, Hugh de Lacy, to the earldom of Ulster came to nothing. By October 1223 Hugh de Lacy had invaded Ireland with the intention to recover Ulster by force. But instead of Ulster, Hugh de Lacy went to Meath and attacked the king’s lands there. In June 1224 William Marshal the younger arrive in Ireland as justiciar to restore order. The Marshal invaded Meath where Aedh, son of Cathal O’Connor and now King of Connacht had attacked a number of de Lacy castles. Meath was recovered for the king but the de Lacy brothers were still active in Ulster with O’Neill support. In late summer the two armies met near Dundalk where Hugh de Lacy surrendered to the Marshal.[8] 

In May 1225 Walter de Lacy made a fine with the king for the restoration of his lands and tenants in Ireland following the rebellion of Hugh de Lacy. To recover his lands Walter paid 300 marks and to recover various castles he pledged a fine of 3,000 marks. As security Walter de Lacy pledged sureties on his English lands of 2,000 marks and 1,000 marks on his Irish lands. One of those who pledged surety for Walter’s debt was Geoffrey of Crowcombe who committed 20 marks if Walter defaulted on his debt to the king.[9]

A year later, in May 1226, Walter de Lacy made a charter with the king for the recovery of a number of castles that were seized and held by the crown following the rebellion of Hugh de Lacy. Walter de Lacy was to hold the castles for three years and then restore them to the king. If within the three years Hugh de Lacy received a pardon then Hugh de Lacy could keep the castles. Among the witnesses to this charter was Geoffrey of Crowcombe.[10]

The kingdom of Connacht  

In June 1226 Geoffrey of Crowcombe was among the king’s court at Windsor to witness another Irish document. The witnesses were a mixture of English and Irish lords. The document was a letter to Geoffrey de Marisco, justiciar of Ireland, to summon Aedh, son of Cathal, late King of Connacht, to surrender his lands to the king because of the forfeiture of Aedh and his father. They had previously been allowed to hold their lands on condition of being faithful to Henry III.[11]

This was a sorry end for Aedh O’Connor who had succeeded his father as King of Connacht in May 1224. One of his first acts as king was to invade Meath and attack the de Lacy lands. He then supported the Marshal in the suppression of the de Lacy rebellion. But events in Connacht were far from tranquillity. The sons of Rory O’Connor, the last High King, rebelled against Aedh O’Connor in 1225 and were supported by many of the Irish in Connacht. Aedh O’Connor got help from Geoffrey de Marisco, acting deputy justiciar for the Marshal, and from the Normans in Munster. After much military action and common plundering, the sons of Rory O’Connor were driven out. But the restoration of Aedh as king was brief.

In June 1226 Geoffrey de Marisco was made justiciar of Ireland and with the prompting of Richard de Burgo and his uncle, Hubert de Burgh, justiciar of England, a complete reversal of policy was made. Recognising that Aedh didn’t have the support of his people the de Burgh’s revived a charter given in 1215 to Richard’s father, William de Burgo for all the land of Connacht.[12]   

On about 21st May 1227 Geoffrey of Crowcombe was at Westminster where he witnessed, along with ten other members of the king’s court, the grant to Richard de Burgo of all the land of Connacht exempt the five cantreds reserved for King Henry. This was a follow on to the surrender by Aedh O’Connor of his kingdom in June 1226.[13] Over the next few years Richard de Burgo and the Normans worked with the sons of Rory O’Connor to control Connacht.

Irish manors and lands

On 2nd May 1227, Geoffrey of Crowcombe was at Mortlake to witness the grant and confirmation of lands in England to Henry de Aldithel. By the same charter Henry de Aldithel received lands within the Earldom of Ulster around the vill of Dunlerr and including some previously held by his brother, Adam de Aldithel. The office of constable of Ulster was also given to Henry de Aldithel.[14]

A few days later, on 6th May 1227, Geoffrey of Crowcombe was at the king’s court at Westminster. While there he was witness of a grant to Ralph de Trubbleville of the manor of Ballymacdon which Robert Rufus had previously leased from King John. On this occasion and at Mortlake Geoffrey of Crowcombe was referred to as a seneschal but of where is unknown to this author.[15] A letter relating to English affairs witnessed by Geoffrey of Crowcombe in October 1232 again described Geoffrey as a seneschal.[16] Many years after 1227 the affairs of Ballymacdon would again come to Geoffrey’s appraisal. On 20th December 1234 Geoffrey of Crowcombe was with the king’s court at Windsor for the grant and confirmation of the gift of Ballymacdon from Henry de Trubbleville to his nephew William de Lunda.[17] Henry de Trubbleville served for a number of terms as seneschal of Gascony.[18]

Grants and liberties of the Archbishopric of Dublin

On 8th November 1229 Geoffrey of Crowcombe was at the king’s court at Westminster. While there he witnessed a grant of dis-afforestation to the church of Dublin and the Archbishop of Dublin for various woods in Dublin and Wicklow. The grant was not only of benefit to the Archbishop of Dublin but everyone dwelling within the large prescribed area could enclose and dispose of woods. Luke, the Archbishop elect, gave the king 300 marks for the charter of dis-afforestation. This grant was inspected by three Irish bishops and one justice in eyre in July 1262 such was its importance and wide ranging impact.[19]

This was a long sought victory for the Archbishopric of Dublin. Many years before, in 1220, when Archbishop Henry de Londres was justiciar of Ireland, he had tried to encroach upon the royal and other forests in the greater Dublin area for the benefit of the Archdiocese. His efforts were resisted by Thomas Fitz Adam, Keeper of the Royal Forests in Ireland. The Archbishop had Thomas imprisoned and excommunicated on the pretext of killing a deer in the Archbishop’s forest. Thomas Fitz Adam complained of the encroachment and his imprisonment to the king. In August 1220 the king agreed to joint management of the king’s forests with the Archbishop.[20] The charter of 1229 gave final victory to the Archbishop.

On 1st January 1230 Geoffrey of Crowcombe was with the king’s court at Doncaster. There he was witness along with at least eight other courtiers to a grant of four carucates of land in Ireland to Amory de St. Amand.[21] By 13th April 1230 the king’s court had moved on to Reading. As part of their business that day, the court examined a number of charters made by King John to John, Archbishop of Dublin while the former was Earl of Morton. These charters granted various ecclesiastical and lay possessions to the archdiocese along with many liberties. The union of Glendalough with Dublin was one of the charters examined and confirmed by the king’s court. Geoffrey of Crowcombe gave his name as witness to the examination and confirmation of the charters.[22]

Compensation to Irish bishops for royal building works

On the following day, 14th April 1230, the king’s court had moved on to Winchester and Geoffrey of Crowcombe went with them. There they witnessed a grant of frankalmoign to Luke, Archbishop of Dublin, of the prebend of Stachmuchan near Tallagh. This prebend had been given by King John to Henry, the former Archbishop, as compensation for the damage done to the church of Dublin during the construction of Dublin castle.[23] Later this prebend was taken into the king’s hand. It was restored to the Archbishop of Dublin at Marlborough on 26th September 1234 in a grant witnessed by many people connected with Ireland and England including Geoffrey of Crowcombe.[24]

One of the medieval towers of Dublin Castle which impacted on the church's property rights

The king’s court continued their circuit of England and was at Portsmouth by 19th April. There they stayed until the end of April. About thirty documents relating to Ireland were produced during that time. It is likely that Geoffrey of Crowcombe was a witness to some or all of these documents but only one document has an extensive witness list. This document (dated 28th April) was an inspection and confirmation of a grant in fee farm of land (worth 10 carucates) at Omayl, near Limerick, to the Bishop of Limerick by King John as compensation for the building of the king’s mills and fisheries at Limerick.[25]  

Fairs, markets and tithes

After Portsmouth the court moved back to Westminster for a few days. Their stay in the capital was not long and by 11th May 1230 they were on the move again. On that latter day Geoffrey of Crowcombe was with hem at Becherelle to witness a grant of an eight day fair at Dundalk to Nicholas de Verdun. By the same grant Nicholas de Verdun got a weekly Thursday market at Clonmore and a free warren on his demesne lands in Ferrard.[26]

Throughout much of Europe the thirteenth century was a period of tremendous growth of population and economic expansion. Improvements in farming practices led to surplus produce for sale and the establishment of fairs and markets helped to facilitate that sale. Across England and the English controlled parts of Ireland charters were given to establish a legal framework for these markets and control the commercial routes. Many of the once a year fairs were held around a local religious festival so that the buying public could get days off work to go to the fair and spend their hard earned money. The establishment of a fair by a royal charter often formalised a pre-existing unlicensed fair that had grown to a reasonable size.[27]

It is not known if Geoffrey of Crowcombe stayed with the king’s court over the succeeding fourteen months as few of the documents from the time have witness lists. Thus it is 21st August 1231 before we next encounter Geoffrey at the king’s court. On the latter day Geoffrey of Crowcombe witnessed a confirmation to the friars of St. Mary of Mount Crosswell of a previous grant made to them by Walter de Lacy. This grant included the ninth sheaf of wheat, oats, rye, barley, peas, beans and other kinds of corn produced on de Lacy’s manors in Ireland. The friars were also to have the tithes of the mill at Kells along with a burgage with the ninth sheaf in every burgh and a messuage in every manor held by de Lacy in Ireland.[28]

After this grant another year passes in which documents relating to Ireland have few witness lists. When we next meet Geoffrey of Crowcombe he was at Winchcomb on 10th June 1232 with the king’s court. There he witnessed a grant of a yearly fair (lasting 8 days) to Hugh Tyrel at his manor of Newtown in Fertelagh.[29]

Hubert de Burgh as justiciar of Ireland

By 15th June 1232 the king’s court was at the royal manor of Woodstock. Two years later Geoffrey of Crowcombe would be given custody of this manor as noted above. In June 1232 Geoffrey was witness to the grant of the justiciary of Ireland to Hubert de Burgh, Earl of Kent and at that time justiciar of England. Hubert de Burgh ran the English government during the minority of Henry III which government also controlled lands in Wales, Ireland and France. As part of the grant Hubert de Burgh could appoint a deputy for Ireland in case of absence or illness. On 16th June Hubert de Burgh was granted the justiciary of Ireland for life. Later in the month (27th June) the king’s court at St. Edmondsbury made a grant to Hubert de Burgh that he did not have to render an account for his time as justiciar in England or Ireland from the date he was appointed justiciar of Ireland.[30]

Hubert de Burgh’s nephew, Richard de Burgo was also honoured with favour. On 21st June 1232 the king’s court were at Lambeth near London. There they witnessed the grant and confirmation of a sale made by Richard, Earl of Cornwall (and the king’s brother), to Richard de Burgo. The sale was the custody of the lands and heirs of Theobald Walter, former butler of Ireland.[31]

But the old Poitevin enemies of Hubert de Burgh were not too far from the King’s ear and sought their revenge. Back in 1219 when Geoffrey Neville finally fulfilled his long threats of resignation as seneschal of Poitou, local leaders there, like Peter des Roches, wanted a native person to be seneschal. But Hubert de Burgh appointed an English lord. Hubert de Burgh long held that England should set her own policy and not be a satellite to a continental system. Excluding aliens, even those from English lands in France, was a first condition to good government.

For much of the 1220s Hubert de Burgh governed England by the English for the English. Yet the English of France had not given up their sense of importance. Peter des Roches and Peter of Rivall slowly gained influence and more particularly the ear of Henry III. The king’s loyalty to his servants was forever liable to change suddenly and fast regardless of the loyalty shown by those servants to the king. The return of Peter des Roches to the see of Winchester in 1231 signalled a strong rival at court.[32]

Just as Hubert de Burgh was achieving greater control, the Poitevins told King Henry bad stories about his ever powerful justiciar. Without little cross examination Henry believed all he was told and removed Hubert de Burgh and his party (including Richard de Burgo) from all offices. Following the removal of Hubert de Burgh as justiciar of England and Ireland, Geoffrey of Crowcombe stayed with the new administration of Poitevin natives. Thus he witnessed two Irish deeds in May 1233 with the French members of the government like Peter, Bishop of Winchester and Peter de Rivall, captain of Poitou. The first deed was a grant for life of the chancery of Ireland to Ralph, Bishop of Chichester and chancellor of England. The second deed was a grant to Ralph Fitz Nicholas of the custody of the lands and heirs of William Pipard in England and Ireland.[33]

Urban liberties

On the same day of 16th June 1232 Geoffrey of Crowcombe witnessed a grant of various liberties and franchises to the city of Waterford. Some of these liberties included that no one within the walls shall take lodging by assize or livery of the marshals against the will of the citizens; no strange merchant shall remain within the city to sell his merchandise but for 40 days unless by the will of the citizens; the citizens shall be quit of toll, lestage, passage, pontage and all other customs throughout the realm and the citizens could make improvements to buildings along the quay and have all vacant spaces within the city to build on.[34]

The King of Man and Ireland

On 10th July 1235 Geoffrey of Crowcombe was with the king’s court at Westminster along with others including Gilbert Marshall, Earl of Pembroke, Ralph Fitz Nicholas and Amory de St. Amand who held lands in Ireland. While there they witnessed a grant of 40 marks, 100 crannocks of wheat and 5 hosheads of wine to Olaf, King of Man and receivable yearly at Easter in Ireland. This was a reward to King Olaf from King Henry for guarding the west coast of England and patrolling the Irish Sea. Yet the grant was not a total reward. King Olaf had to supply 50 galleys to the English king when called upon.[35]

The Irish crannock was equivalent to the English quarter. The value of the crannock differed from crop to crop. A crannock of wheat was worth eight bushels while a crannock of oats was sixteen bushels.[36]

The last Irish deed of Geoffrey of Crowcombe

The last Irish deed witnessed by Geoffrey of Crowcombe was in April 1236 when Gilbert Marshall, Earl of Pembroke, promised not to harbour at least nine named individuals following the death of Henry Clement, clerk and messenger of the justiciary of Ireland. Gilbert Marshal also promised not to have his men go about armed in the king’s land to do evil against the king.[37]

It would seem that Geoffrey of Crowcombe died sometime after April 1236 and before September 1239. In the latter month the estate of his wife, Alice of Crowcombe (nee Cormeilles) passed to her nephew and nieces without any reference to Geoffrey which would suggest that he was decease by that time. Yet as we have seen Geoffrey of Crowcombe was often referred to as a witness to the history of Ireland between 1210 and 1236, a country he visited at least two occasions.

===========

End of post

===========





[1] Paul Dryburgh & Beth Hartland (eds.), Calendar of the Fine Rolls of the Reign of Henry III (3 vols. Boydell Press & National Archives, 2007), Vol. 1 (1216-1224), No. 5/123; Paul Dryburgh & Beth Hartland (eds.), Calendar of the Fine Rolls of the Reign of Henry III (3 vols. Boydell Press & National Archives, 2008), Vol. II (1224-1234), Nos. 9/207, 14/88-89, 260, 16/307, 18/167
[2] H.S. Sweetman (ed.), Calendar of Documents relating to Ireland (Kraus reprint, 1974), Vol. 1 (1171-1252), no. 406
[3] A.J. Otway-Ruthven, A history of medieval Ireland (Ernest Benn, London, 1980), pp. 79-80
[4] John T. Gilbert, History of the Viceroys of Ireland (James Duffy, Dublin, 1865), pp. 73, 76, 505-506; Goddard Henry Orpen, Ireland under the Normans (Four Courts Press, Dublin, 2005), vol. 2, p. 256
[5] H.S. Sweetman (ed.), Calendar of Documents relating to Ireland, Vol. 1 (1171-1252), no. 1747
[6] John T. Gilbert, History of the Viceroys of Ireland, p. 85
[7] H.S. Sweetman (ed.), Calendar of Documents relating to Ireland, Vol. 1 (1171-1252), nos. 1015, 1016
[8] A.J. Otway-Ruthven, A history of medieval Ireland, pp. 89-92
[9] H.S. Sweetman (ed.), Calendar of Documents relating to Ireland, Vol. 1 (1171-1252), no. 1289
[10] H.S. Sweetman (ed.), Calendar of Documents relating to Ireland, Vol. 1 (1171-1252), no. 1372
[11] H.S. Sweetman (ed.), Calendar of Documents relating to Ireland, Vol. 1 (1171-1252), no. 1402
[12] A.J. Otway-Ruthven, A history of medieval Ireland (Ernest Benn, London, 1980), pp. 91-93
[13] H.S. Sweetman (ed.), Calendar of Documents relating to Ireland, Vol. 1 (1171-1252), no. 1518
[14] H.S. Sweetman (ed.), Calendar of Documents relating to Ireland, Vol. 1 (1171-1252), no. 1505
[15] H.S. Sweetman (ed.), Calendar of Documents relating to Ireland, Vol. 1 (1171-1252), no. 1508
[16] Rev. Walter W. Shirley (ed.), Royal and other historical letters illustrative of the Reign of Henry III (2 vols. Longman Green, London, 1862), vol. 1, no. cccxxxv, p. 409
[17] H.S. Sweetman (ed.), Calendar of Documents relating to Ireland, Vol. 1 (1171-1252), no. 2233
[18] Rev. Walter W. Shirley (ed.), Royal and other historical letters of the Reign of Henry III, vol. 2, pp. 399-400 [years served include Oct. 1227 to July 1231, May 1234 to Sept. 1237 & Nov. 1238 to Sept. 1241]
[19] H.S. Sweetman (ed.), Calendar of Documents relating to Ireland, Vol. 1 (1171-1252), nos. 1757, 1760; Charles McNeill (ed.), Calendar of Archbishop Alen’s Register, c.1172-1534 (Royal Society of Antiquaries of Ireland, 1950), pp. 62, 96
[20] John T. Gilbert, History of the Viceroys of Ireland, pp. 85-6; Rev. Walter W. Shirley (ed.), Royal and other historical letters of the Reign of Henry III, vol. 1, pp. 82-87; H.S. Sweetman (ed.), Calendar of Documents relating to Ireland, Vol. 1 (1171-1252), no. 951
[21] H.S. Sweetman (ed.), Calendar of Documents relating to Ireland, Vol. 1 (1171-1252), no. 1772
[22] H.S. Sweetman (ed.), Calendar of Documents relating to Ireland, Vol. 1 (1171-1252), nos. 1787, 1788, 1789; Charles McNeill (ed.), Calendar of Archbishop Alen’s Register, c.1172-1534, pp. 64, 211
[23] H.S. Sweetman (ed.), Calendar of Documents relating to Ireland, Vol. 1 (1171-1252), no. 1790; Charles McNeill (ed.), Calendar of Archbishop Alen’s Register, c.1172-1534, p. 64
[24] H.S. Sweetman (ed.), Calendar of Documents relating to Ireland, Vol. 1 (1171-1252), no. 2177; Charles McNeill (ed.), Calendar of Archbishop Alen’s Register, c.1172-1534, p. 66
[25] H.S. Sweetman (ed.), Calendar of Documents relating to Ireland, Vol. 1 (1171-1252), nos. 1795-1824, 1812
[26] H.S. Sweetman (ed.), Calendar of Documents relating to Ireland, Vol. 1 (1171-1252), no. 1829
[27] Karina Holton, ‘From charters to carters: aspects of fairs and markets in medieval Ireland’, in Irish Fairs and Markets: Studies in Local History, edited by Denis A. Cronin, Jim Gilligan & Karina Holton (Four Courts Press, Dublin, 2001), pp. 18, 20, 25
[28] H.S. Sweetman (ed.), Calendar of Documents relating to Ireland, Vol. 1 (1171-1252), no. 1909
[29] H.S. Sweetman (ed.), Calendar of Documents relating to Ireland, Vol. 1 (1171-1252), no. 1951
[30] H.S. Sweetman (ed.), Calendar of Documents relating to Ireland, Vol. 1 (1171-1252), nos. 1955, 1957, 1963
[31] H.S. Sweetman (ed.), Calendar of Documents relating to Ireland, Vol. 1 (1171-1252), no. 1962
[32] Rev. Walter W. Shirley (ed.), Royal and other historical letters of the Reign of Henry III, vol. 1, pp. xxiv, xxv, xxviii, xxxii
[33] H.S. Sweetman (ed.), Calendar of Documents relating to Ireland, Vol. 1 (1171-1252), nos. 2033, 2034
[34] H.S. Sweetman (ed.), Calendar of Documents relating to Ireland, Vol. 1 (1171-1252), no. 1958
[35] H.S. Sweetman (ed.), Calendar of Documents relating to Ireland, Vol. 1 (1171-1252), no. 2269
[36] Kevin Down, ‘Colonial society and economy’, in A new history of Ireland, vol. 2, medieval Ireland, 1169-1534, edited by Art Cosgrove (Oxford University Press, 2008), p. 459, note 4
[37] H.S. Sweetman (ed.), Calendar of Documents relating to Ireland, Vol. 1 (1171-1252), no. 2321

Tuesday, February 11, 2014

Margaret de Cormeilles and a miscarriage of justice

Margaret de Cormeilles and a miscarriage of justice

Niall C.E.J. O’Brien

In May 1236 Alice and Isabella Cormeilles had recently buried their mother, Margaret de Cormeilles. Now a jury of twelve men in Gloucestershire denied ever knowing Margaret de Cormeilles and that she held any land in Gloucestershire directly from the king. Yet a separate jury in Herefordshire knew that Margaret de Cormeilles held two knight’s fees and that one of these was in Gloucestershire and they even knew the man who held it. Were the two daughters of Margaret the victims of twelve angry men or was something else afoot?

Can we, eight hundred years later, correct a miscarriage of justice or will some other twist turn the story? So, who was Margaret de Cormeilles and can we put a biography to the name? Her surname of Cormeilles comes from the town of Cormeilles (also written as Cormaill) in the Eure Department of France.

Her father was Walter de Cormeilles of Taddington, Herefordshire. Walter de Cormeilles died before 13th August 1204 and after which Peter de Stokes obtained custody of his lands. These lands were at Taddington, Bullingham, Clehonger, and Aston in Herefordshire and at Weston-sub-Edge in Gloucstershire.[1] His daughter Margaret de Cormeilles married twice. Her first husband was Walter de Stokes by whom she had two daughters, Alice and Isabella. After Walter de Stokes died, Margaret remarried and her second husband was Hugh le Poer.

Inquisitions Post Mortem for Margaret

Margaret de Cormeilles died sometime before mid-May 1236 and as was the practice at that time the government order an inquisition to be made as to what lands Margaret held and more importantly was there any taxes or potential income due to the crown. On 16th May 1236 a writ for an inquisition post mortem was sent to the sheriff of Herefordshire to enquire into the estate of the late Margaret de Cormeilles. A jury of twelve men led by Sir Robert de Stapleton met at an undisclosed location and at an unknown date where they found that Margaret had a half knights fee in Tatinton and in Bolingehop in Olehungre, wherein she had three carucates of land in demesne, paying an annual rent of 100 shillings and worth £13 per year with the said rent. All these lands were held in chief of the King.

The jury also said that Margaret had a further two knights fees. One of these was in the vill of Eston in Herefordshire and was held by Roger de Eston. The other fee was attached to the vills of Begesoure and Hennemere in Gloucestershire. This fee was held by James de Solers.

The jury then found that Margaret had two married daughters, Alice and Isabella who were her heirs. Alice, the elder daughter, had married Robert le Archer while Isabella had married Simon de Solers.[2]  

Having concluded their work the jury began to make their way home while the heirs were happy with a good result in their favour. But questions of land title remained unresolved. On the following day, 17th May 1236, another writ was sent to the sheriff of Gloucestershire to enquire if Margaret de Cormeilles held any land in Gloucestershire in chief of the King.

It would seem that the Cormeilles family gave the impression of holding land in Gloucestershire or the possession of a knight’s fee there suggested possible land ownership. The jury of twelve met on an unknown date where they found that “They have not known or heard of any Margaret de Cormeilles holding any land of the King in chief” in Gloucestershire. Instead they said that Albreda de Marmium held certain lands in the county of the King as her dower lands. By 1236 these lands had passed to Henry de Penebregg who held them from Hugh Giffard who held of the King.[3] A later inquisition in 1279 identifies these Gloucestershire lands as situated at Weston. In that year Henry, son of Henry de Penebregg held the lands from Walter Giffard, Archbishop of York.[4]

The daughters and heirs of Margaret de Cormeilles lost little time in entering their inheritance. By 30th May 1236 Robert le Archer and Simon de Solers had given homage to King Henry III for Margaret’s lands in Herefordshire. They were to pay £25 for entry and the sheriff of Herefordshire was directed on the 30th to take security for the entry fine. By the king’s letter we are told that lands of Margaret de Cormeilles comprised a fourth part of the Barony of Cormeilles.

Included in the letter to the Sheriff of Herefordshire was an order directing him to inform the sheriff of Gloucestershire when he had taken security for the fine. But the inquisition held in Gloucestershire arrived at court before the letter to Herefordshire was sent. When the clerk noticed that Margaret de Cormeilles had no land in Gloucestershire the included order to the sheriff of Herefordshire was crossed out.[5]

Margaret’s lands in Gloucestershire explained?

By all accounts the daughters of Margaret de Cormeilles and their husbands settled into their Herefordshire lands without too much difficulty. About three years later some explanation for the supposed Gloucestershire lands of Margaret de Cormeilles began to appear. On 9th September 1239 Henry III informed the sheriff of Herefordshire that he had taken the homage of Hugh Giffard and his wife Sibyl for the lands and tenements lately held by Alice of Crowcombe (lately deceased) along with the homage of the other heirs of Alice. This Hugh Giffard was possibly the same man who held Weston-sub-Edge in Gloucestershire in 1236 while his wife, Sibyl, was a sister and co-heiress of Alice of Crowcombe.

The other heirs of Alice of Crowcombe who gave homage to the king for her lands in Herefordshire included her nephew, John le Brun; her third heir and niece, Alice de Cormeilles (through her husband Robert le Archer), and her fourth heir and niece, Isabella de Cormeilles (through her husband Simon de Solers).[6]

The document of 1239 thus showed that Hugh Giffard had married a sister of Margaret de Cormeilles. Therefore the idea of Margaret de Cormeilles having land in Gloucestershire, where Hugh Giffard had land, may have had some basis in fact. Whatever the situation surrounding these Gloucestershire lands was, they must have changed long before 1236 to make jury totally ignorant of any attachment to Margaret de Cormeilles.

No inquisition post mortem seems to have survived for Alice of Crowcombe to enlighten us as to her estate. To add further mystery no mention is made of any lands in Somersetshire in which county is the place called Crowcombe. We equally have little knowledge of Alice’s family. She had no living children but she had a husband at some time as she is called Alice of Crowcombe and not Alice de Cormeilles, which is what she would have been called if she was unmarried.

Do we know the husband of Alice de Cormeilles? One candidate for that role is Geoffrey of Crowcombe. Geoffrey of Crowcombe was an active person in the early years of the reign of Henry III. In the winter and spring of 1224-1225 Geoffrey of Crowcombe was proctor at Rome for Henry III along with Stephen Lucy. The Pope, Honorius III, met the proctors and told them that Henry III must be more impartial and forbearing towards his subjects.[7] In May 1225 Geoffrey of Crowcombe was sent to France as an ambassador for Henry III. In 1229-30 he was assessor and collector of the tallage in Norfolk and Suffolk. About April 1230 Geoffrey was made sheriff of Oxfordshire. From October 1232 to March 1234 Geoffrey of Crowcombe was issuing royal writs on behalf of the king. In June 1234 Geoffrey was given custody of the royal manor of Woodstock (now Blenheim Palace) while continuing to hold the royal castle at Oxford.[8]

But was Geoffrey of Crowcumbe the husband of Alice of Crowcombe? One of the earliest documents concerning Geoffrey of Crowcombe gives him connections to Gloucestershire. In June 1220 the sheriff of Gloucestershire was order to give respite to Geoffrey of Crowcombe for a demand of money because Geoffrey was in Poitou on the king’s service.[9] An entry in the fine rolls for September 1226 tells us of an order to the sheriff of Gloucestershire to place in respite the demand of 20 marks from Geoffrey of Crowcombe for the land of John, son and heir of Richard Brown, who was in the custody of Geoffrey.[10] Earlier we saw that a person called John le Brun (Brown) was a nephew of Alice of Crowcombe.

To confirm the connection we have a letter to the sheriff of Herefordshire in August 1221. The sheriff was order to give respite to Geoffrey of Crowcombe for the scutages of Ireland, Poitou, Scotland and Wales which were payable on the half knight’s fee formerly held by Walter de Cormeilles in the time of King John. A similar letter was sent to the sheriff of Gloucestershire.[11]

[See a related article about Geoffrey of Crowcombe and his associations with Ireland = article link]

Another Gloucestershire explanation

Having come to no certain conclusion about any Gloucestershire lands of Margaret de Cormeilles through Alice of Crowcombe we must search elsewhere. Working further of the biography of Margaret we find that Aubrey Marmion was the mother of Margaret de Cormeilles.[12] The jury of the Gloucestershire inquisition reported that Albreda (Aubrey) de Marmion had held lands in dower from the king in that county.[13] The Gloucestershire connection is now more fully understood. When Aubrey Marmion died her lands in Gloucestershire were inherited by her daughter Sibyl who married Hugh Giffard. As was the practice when an estate had only female heirs the property was divided among the heiress in equal portions. Thus Sibyl got Weston-sub-Edge and other Gloucestershire property as her portion.

St. Lawrence (ex St. John the Baptist) Church, Weston-sub-Edge 
from 123rf.com by Andrew Roland

Margaret de Cormeilles mother, Aubrey Marmion was the daughter and heiress of Geoffrey Marmion of Arrow, Warwickshire. After the death of Walter de Cormeilles in 1204, Aubrey married William de Camville (died after 1205) by whom she had Geoffrey de Camville (died c.1219).[14]

Ancient inheritance

The Cormeilles lands in Herefordshire and Gloucestershire mentioned in the above transactions and inquisitions were part of the ancient inheritance of the family. Ansfrid de Cormeilles was the first to leave northern France and come over to England at the Norman Conquest. By 1086 he had seven lordships in Herefordshire and sixteen in Gloucestershire.[15]

In 1086 Ansfrid de Cormeilles is listed as owner of the manors of Weston-sub-Edge, Norton, Batsford, Winstone, Shipton (part of), Tantesborne, Pauntley, Kilcot, Ketford, Hayes by Newent, and Duntisbourne (part of) in Gloucestershire. He was a tenant of the king at Beckford and Ashton under Hill.[16] In all Ansfrid de Cormeilles held about 10,700 acres or just over 46 hides of lands, making him one of the top ten lay-landowners in Gloucestershire.[17]

Ansfrid de Cormeilles acquired his Gloucestershire lands from a number of sources. Through his wife, a niece of Walter de Lacy (sometimes written as Roger de Lacy), he acquired Winstone, Duntesbourne, Pauntley, Ketford and other places near Newent by grant of Walter de Lacy. From his chief lord, Earl William Fitz Osbern, Ansfrid de Cormeilles received the manors of Beckford and Ashton-under-Hill. It would appear that Ansfrid de Cormeilles and Earl William Fitz Osbern knew each other from their days in Normandy. Earl William founded the Abbey of Cormeilles and endowed it with extensive lands and churches in Gloucestershire. Some of these churches were on land held by Ansfrid de Cormeilles.[18]

Charles Taylor records that Margaret de Cormeilles, daughter of Walter de Cormeilles, held the manor of Postlip, while her sister, Aubrey de Cormeilles (mother of John le Brun), held Cotes.[19]

Ansfrid de Cormeilles (died c.1100) was succeeded by his son, Alexander de Cormeilles, Lord of Tarrington. Alexander married a de Monmouth woman and had at least three sons, Richard, Robert and Alexander. He was succeeded by his eldest son, Richard de Cormeilles. Richrad de Cormeilles (died c.1177) was succeeded by his son Walter de Cormeilles.[20]  

Thus the Margaret de Cormeilles of this article was a great, great granddaughter of Ansfrid de Cormeilles of the Domesday Survey. She held a part of Colesborne, Gloucestershire, in which there was a wood called Power’s Wood, named for her second husband, Hugh le Poer.[21]

Some post 1236 information

The two daughters of Margaret de Cormeilles settled down to life in Herefordshire after their uncle-in-law took the Gloucestershire lands of the Cormeilles family. Sometime around 1259-60 Simon de Solers, husband of Isabella de Cormeilles, died. At that time he held two carucates of land at Tadington (Tarrington) and Bulinghope (Bullingham) in Herefordshire. Simon de Solers was succeeded by his son Thomas de Solers who was over twenty-one years in 1260.[22] 

Later in 1261 Alice de Cormeilles died and was succeeded by her son, Colin le Archer, who was aged about twenty-three years. Alice de Cormeilles held two carucates of land at Tarrington, Bullingham and Clehungre. She also jointly held with her younger sister, Isabella, the two knights fees attached to Hope Solers and Astun. These fees and tenements were jointly held by the sisters as a third part of the service pertaining to the Barony of Cormeilles.[23] Colin le Archer was later succeeded by Nicholas le Archer who in turn was succeeded in 1280 by his son, Nicholas le Archer.[24] By 1289 the manor of Tarrington and the one third of a knight’s fee in the Barony of Cormeilles was held of the king by Baldwin de Frevill but his connection with the Archer family is unstated.[25]

If Margaret’s daughters failed to get into Gloucestershire in 1236 there appears to have been little obstacle in the Giffard family moving into Herefordshire. On the death of Walter Giffard, Archbishop of York, in 1279 we find that he held among other places, including Weston-sub-Edge in Gloucestershire, one carucate of land in Tarrington, a third of a carucate in Bullingham along with assize rent at Clehungre and Bullingham, and that these lands were held of the king in chief.[26]

Justice done with cautious reading of medieval documents

At the start of this article we read an inquisition post mortem which seemed to deny the daughters of Margaret de Cormeilles from getting their rightful lands in Gloucestershire. We were beginning to cry foul and report a miscarriage of justice. But like in a present-day court room the jurors answered the question on the writ, i.e. “how much land Margaret de Cormeilles held of the king in chief in Gloucestershire”. But they just answered the question and not the whole truth. They mentioned Aubrey Marmion holding the land in dower and in 1236 it was held by Hugh Giffard but gave no hint in any shape or form that Aubrey was the mother of Margaret de Cormeilles and that Hugh was her brother-in-law.

As Philomena Connolly once wrote “The information given in the record sources [usually government documents] can be incomplete in several ways. First, we are obviously only given one side of the story that of the government and the information is usually the minimum needed for administration purposes”.[27] The Gloucestershire jurors did just that – gave the “minimum needed for [the] administration purpose”.

=============

End of post

=============





[2] Sidney J. Madge (ed.), Abstracts of Inquisitions Post Mortem for Gloucestershire in the Plantagenet Period, part IV, 1236-1300 (British Record Society, London, 1903), pp. 1, 2; J.E.E.S Sharp (ed.), Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem preserved in the Public Record Office (Kraus reprint, 1973), Vol. 1, Henry III, No. 5
[3] Sidney J. Madge (ed.), Abstracts of Inquisitions Post Mortem for Gloucestershire, part IV, 1236-1300, p. 2; J.E.E.S Sharp (ed.), Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem, Vol. 1, Henry III, No. 5
[4] Sidney J. Madge (ed.), Abstracts of Inquisitions Post Mortem for Gloucestershire, part IV, 1236-1300, p. 108
[5] Paul Dryburgh & Beth Hartland (eds.), Calendar of the Fine Rolls of the Reign of Henry III (3 vols. Boydell Press & National Archives, 2009), Vol. III (1234-1242), Nos. 20/308-309
[6] Paul Dryburgh & Beth Hartland (eds.), Calendar of the Fine Rolls of Henry III, Vol. III (1234-1242), No. 23/334
[7] Rev. Walter W. Shirley (ed.), Royal and other historical letters illustrative of the Reign of Henry III (2 vols. Longman Green, London, 1862), nos. ccix, ccxv, p. 540
[8] Paul Dryburgh & Beth Hartland (eds.), Calendar of the Fine Rolls of the Reign of Henry III (3 vols. Boydell Press & National Archives, 2008), Vol. II (1224-1234), Nos. 9/207, 14/88-89, 260, 16/307, 18/167
[9] Paul Dryburgh & Beth Hartland (eds.), Calendar of the Fine Rolls of the Reign of Henry III (3 vols. Boydell Press & National Archives, 2007), Vol. 1 (1216-1224), No. 5/123
[10] Paul Dryburgh & Beth Hartland (eds.), Calendar of the Fine Rolls of Henry III, Vol. II (1224-1234), Nos. 10/282
[11] Paul Dryburgh & Beth Hartland (eds.), Calendar of the Fine Rolls of Henry III, Vol. 1 (1216-1224), Nos. 5/267-268
[13] Sidney J. Madge (ed.), Abstracts of Inquisitions Post Mortem for Gloucestershire, part IV, 1236-1300, p. 2
[16] Charles S. Taylor, An analysis of the Domesday Survey of Gloucestershire (Bristol, 1889), pp. 232-3, 236, 241, 264, 268, 272, 280, 284, 316
[17] Charles S. Taylor, An analysis of the Domesday Survey of Gloucestershire (Bristol, 1889), pp. 99, 222
[18] Charles S. Taylor, An analysis of the Domesday Survey of Gloucestershire, pp. 13, 21, 174, 201, 241
[19] Charles S. Taylor, An analysis of the Domesday Survey of Gloucestershire, p. 141
[21] Charles S. Taylor, An analysis of the Domesday Survey of Gloucestershire, p. 157
[22] J.E.E.S Sharp (ed.), Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem, Vol. 1, Henry III, No. 433
[23] J.E.E.S Sharp (ed.), Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem, Vol. 1, Henry III, No. 484
[24] J.E.E.S Sharp (ed.), Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem preserved in the Public Record Office (Kraus reprint, 1973), Vol. 2, Edward 1, No. 346
[25] J.E.E.S Sharp (ed.), Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem preserved in the Public Record Office (Kraus reprint, 1973), Vol. 2, Edward 1, No. 709
[26] J.E.E.S Sharp (ed.), Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem preserved in the Public Record Office (Kraus reprint, 1973), Vol. 2, Edward 1, No. 314
[27] Philomena Connolly, Medieval Record Sources (Four Courts Press, Dublin, 2002), p. 69