Showing posts with label Berkeley. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Berkeley. Show all posts

Thursday, January 4, 2018

Siston manor in Gloucestershire 1200 to c.1450

Siston manor in Gloucestershire 1200 to c.1450

Niall C.E.J. O’Brien

Siston is a small village and parish at the southern end of the County of Gloucestershire which contains 1,827 acres. The village lies at the confluence of the two sources of the Siston Brook, a tributary of the River Avon. The village consists of a number of cottages and farms centred on St Anne's Church, and the grand Tudor manor house of Siston Court. Previous articles on Siston can be found at 

http://celtic2realms-medievalnews.blogspot.ie/2014/10/siston-gloucestershire-c1086-to-c1220.html

and 

http://celtic2realms-medievalnews.blogspot.ie/2014/12/siston-manor-gloucestershire-in-1273.html

This article explores the people and places of Siston from about 1200 to about 1450.

Siston Church

On 8th March 1305 the king presented Philip Cok, chaplain, to the church of Siston in the diocese of Worcester.[1] In July 1339 Thomas de Hazelhawe, parson of Pokelchurch and others challenged the right of Peter Corbet to the advowson of Siston. The king ordered the sheriff of Gloucester to arrest the mainprisers of Thomas de Hazelhawe and the others if they lose the court case or fail to prosecute. But by October 1339 Thomas de Hazelhawe and others had successful brought an action in the county court against the king’s writ to the sheriff because of a legal technicality. Therefore Thomas and the others were allowed to name new mainprisers and proceed with the case without fear of imprisonment by the king’s officials.[2]

In May 1388 Geoffrey Chauncerell, parson of Siston exchanged the benefice with John Averey of the parish of Bromle in the diocese of Winchester.[3]

In November 1498 Roger Church visited the deanery of Hawkesbury on behalf of John Morton, Archbishop of Canterbury because there was no bishop of Worcester at that time. In the church of Great Sodbury he saw the parish clergy of the deanery which included Siston. The parish rector was Edward Geynard while Matthew Syllys was the chaplain. Richard and John Clerk were the churchwardens.[4]

People of thirteenth century Siston

On 27th February 1263 Adam de Greynvill was appointed to enquire by jurors of the county of Gloucester whether John le Cuhurde of Siston, deceased, died by his own hand or was killed by another.[5]

The inquisition post mortem into the lands of Robert Waleraund in 1273 was held at Siston. The jury assembled before Sir Robert de Kingeston, sub-escheator of the county, were possibly local people from in and around Siston. They included Adam Malet. Nicholas Joy, Roger de Hildesle, Hugh de Leytrinton, Richard Poyntel, John Woodcock, Reginald de la Leygrave, Geoffrey de Fraxino, Thomas de Doynton, William de Stone, Walter le Hope and John de Werneleye.[6]

On 25th January 1292 Richard de Siston was given licence to alienate in mortmain to the priory and convent of St. Oswald’s at Gloucester, a messuage in the town of Gloucester. Numerous other people were given licence to alienate to St. Oswald’s at the same time.[7]

From Berkeley to Waleraund to the Bishop of Bath & Wells

By 1273 Robert Waleraund held the manor of Siston from Henry de Berkeley, Lord of Dursley by the service of one knight’s fee.[8] Yet previously in 1218 Siston was given by Glastonbury to the Bishop of Bath and Wells who held claim until the dissolution. On 11th April 1268 the dean and chapter of Wells granted a wood in Pucklechurch, beside the park, to Robert Waleraund to be added to the park. This wood was formerly held by Robert de Siston from Bishop Walter of Wells.[9] An inquisition post mortem taken at Pucklechurch on 5th March 1362 found that Sir Peter Corbet of Siston held the manor of Siston from the Bishop of Bath and Wells.[10]

Siston parish church of St. Anne

Corbet of Siston

The first mention of the Corbet family of Siston comes from the affairs of their cousins. On 18th November 1341 a licence was granted for Walter, son of Walter de Gloucester to enfeoff John de Ingelby, chaplain, and Robert de Brugsreford of two parts of the manors of Alveston and Erdcote, with the hundred of Langele (Langtree) and view of frankpledge of Langele, and the reversion of a third part of the manors expectant on the demise of Eleanor, late the wife of Fulk le Fitz Waryn, tenant in dower, and for them to re-grant the same, all held in chief as is said, to him (Walter) and Petronilla his wife in tail, with remainder to Peter Corbet of Siston in fee.[11]

Alveston manor was located two miles south of Thornbury Station. The place means Aelfweald’s stone where a wolf-pit was located in about 955-9.[12] The manor of Alveston was held by Roger de Iveri in the Domesday Book of 1086.[13] The meaning but not the location of Erdcote was given by W. St. Clair Baddeley.[14]

On 10th July 1360 Walter, son of Walter de Gloucester, knight, died and was succeeded by his son John de Gloucester who was aged eleven years. An inquisition post mortem was held at Alveston on 12th October 1360. It found that the manors of Alveston and Erdcote along with the hundred of Langtree and the view of frankpledge were held jointly by Walter and his widow, Petronilla from the king in chief by knight’s service. This was the only property Walter had in Gloucestershire.

The third part of the property was formerly held by Eleanor, wife of the late Fulk Fitz Waryn but on her death this reverted to Walter and Petronilla. Walter de Gloucester had then granted the full property to John de Ingelby, chaplain, and Robert de Briggeford who re-granted to Walter and Petronilla and their heirs. If Walter and Petronilla had no heirs then the property would pass to Peter Corbet of Siston and his heirs.[15]

As Walter de Gloucester had a son by Petronilla there was no reversion to Peter Corbet. On Tuesday after All Saints 1361 Sir Peter Corbet of Siston died. An inquisition post mortem taken at Pucklechurch on 5th March 1362 found that Sir Peter only held the manor of Siston and no other property in Gloucestershire. The manor was held from the Bishop of Bath and Wells. Sir Peter’s son William Corbet was dead and thus Sir Peter was succeeded by his grandson, John Corbet who was ten years old.[16]

Because the heir was a minor, the escheator of Gloucester, Philip de Luttel, thought he had a right to seize the manor of Siston for the crown. But on 10th March 1362 Philip de Luttel was told to give up the manor and the income gathered as the manor was not held directly of the king but by others, namely the Bishop of Bath and Wells.[17]

On 24th September 1368 Peter son and heir of Walter de Gloucester, knight, died. A inquisition post mortem taken at Bristol on 14th January 1369 found that Peter de Gloucester held the manors of Alveston and Erdcote with the hundred of Langtree and the view of Frankpledge. The jury found that Peter de Gloucester left no heirs of his body and that there were no direct heirs of Walter and Petronilla de Gloucester. The property by reversion should go to John Corbet son of William Corbet and grandson of Sir Peter Corbet.[18]

On 14th February 1370 an exemplification was granted, at the request of John Corbet, kinsman and heir of Peter Corbet of Siston, of the letters patent, dated 18 November in the king's fifteenth year, in favour of the said Peter.[19]

On 12 September 1371 John son of William Corbet died. He was succeeded by his brother who was variously names as William and Peter and who was eighteen years old. Two sets of inquisitions post mortem were held into the property of John Corbet. The later one, held at Caus in Shropshire on 16th October, found that John had the hamlet of Hope in the lordship of Caus from Ralph, Earl of Stafford, by knight’s service. But the ground was hilly land within the Forest of Caus where deer had destroyed what was left untilled.[20]

The earlier inquisition was taken at Alveston in Gloucestershire on 23rd September. It found that John Corbet held two-thirds of the manors of Alveston and Erdcote from the king in chief by knight’s service. John Corbet also had two-thirds of the hundred of Langtree by the same terms.

At Siston, John Corbet held the manor from the Bishop of Bath and Wells by knight’s service. In August 1370 John gave Siston to Rev. Roger de Dene, chaplain, Ralph Waleys and William Hobekyn in fee. The conditions attached to the grant were that they could take o profit for their own use or retain it for themselves and their heirs. Instead, John’s bailiffs, who were there before the feoffment, should take the profits to their use as they did before. The feoffees should re-enfeoff John Corbet and his heirs on demand because the feoffment was made as security for £11 due to Roger de Dene.[21]

John Corbet had only given the manor in simple seisin and kept the living for his own use. John Corbet also gave the young pigeons from the dovecote and the fruits of the garden to the wife of William de Chiltenham. At the time of John’s death that feoffees still held the manor.[22]

Other people of fourteenth century Siston

On 17th February 1375 John Milner of Siston was pardoned for the death of Adam Milner of Belton. Roger de Kirketon and Henry Asty, justices appointed to deliver the goal of Lincoln castle advised that he killed him in self-defence.[23] 

On 1st December 1378 Thomas de Berkeley, Roger de Kirketon, Robert Tresilyan, David Hannemere and John Sergeaunt were made special assignees for the tenements of Alveston and Siston. The names of the parties involved in the dispute are not named.[24]

Siston in the fifteenth century

By the early years of the fifteenth century Siston manor had passed from the Corbet family to the Dennis family. Sir Peter Corbet of 1362 left a daughter, Margaret who would eventually become his co-heiress. She married Sir Gilbert Dennis.[25]

About 29th September 1408 Sir Gilbert Dennis celebrated the birth of a son. A short time after the boy was baptised as Maurice Dennis in the church of St. Ann at Siston. A number of locals and visitors were involved at the baptism. Richard Williams, butler to Sir Gilbert, carried a silver pot of wine to the church while John Thornton carried a torch and John Field carried a basin from Siston manor to the church. In Siston church, by the finely carved Norman font, John Blount, John Grevell and Elizabeth Reome acted as godparents to the young Maurice Dennis.[26]

On 5th March 1428 Sir John de Berkeley died. He held a great many properties in various counties across the west of England. At Chipping Sodbury on 24th April 1428 an inquiry was held into the Gloucestershire property of John de Berkeley. Among other places it found that de Berkeley held a toft (worth nothing) and 10 acres of arable land at Alveston, worth 8 pence per acre per annum from Gilbert Dennis by service unknown.[27]

After the death of Sir Gilbert Dennis two thirds of his property and lands of Siston, Alveston and Erdcote with the hundred of Langtree were given in custody to Edward Stradlyng by King Henry V.[28]

On 16th July 1431 a writ of etate probanda was issue to establish if Maurice Dennis was of age to inherit his father’s Gloucestershire property. At Tetbury on 22nd September 1431 the proof of age inquiry of Maurice Dennis was held in the presence of Edward Stradlyng, chevalier. The inquiry found that Maurice was twenty-two years old on the previous 29th September.

On 25th February 1450 a commission was given to James de Berkley, knight, William de Berkley, Westminster, knight, James de Berkley, esquire, Roger Kemys, Arthur de Clopton, esquire, Thomas Fitz Herry and John Kemys of Siston, esquire, appointing them to make inquisition in the county of Gloucestershire and the adjacent march of Wales touching the lands which have come into the king's hands by the death of Henry, duke of Warwick, tenant in chief, and by reason of the minority of Anne, his daughter and heir.[29]

After 1450 Siston experience the Wars of the Roses and the revolution of the Tudor monarchs but these stories are for another day.

=============

End of post

==============




[1] Calendar of the Patent Rolls, Edward I, 1301-1307, p. 316
[2] Calendar of Close Rolls, Edward III, 1339-1341, p. 234
[3] Calendar of Patent Rolls, Richard II, 1385-1389, p. 441
[4] Christopher Harper Hill (ed.), The Register of John Morton Archbishop of Canterbury 1486-1500, volume II (Canterbury & York Society, 1991), no. 483
[5] Calendar of the Patent Rolls, Henry III, 1258-1266, p. 285
[6] Sidney J. Madge (ed.), Abstracts of inquisitions post mortem for Gloucestershire, part IV, 1236-1300 (British Record Society, 1903), p. 59
[7] Calendar of the Patent Rolls, Edward I, 1281-1292, p. 471
[8] Sidney J. Madge (ed.), Abstracts of inquisitions post mortem for Gloucestershire, part IV, 1236-1300 (British Record Society, 1903), pp. 28, 59; Charles S. Taylor, An analysis of the Domesday Survey of Gloucestershire, p. 269; C.R. Elrington (ed.), Abstracts of feet of fines relating to Gloucestershire 1199-1299, nos. 99, 115, 768. An associated manor of Cobberley was mentioned in the inquisition post mortem of Robert Waleraund. In 1086 Cobberley in Rapsgate hundred was held by Roger I de Berkeley. In 1221 Cobberley was held by Henry de Berkeley and later that year by Robert de Berkeley. In 1270 Giles de Berkeley held Cobberley. Giles de Berkeley was a brother of Nicholas de Berkeley who died about 1263. Giles de Berkeley was born about 1241. In 1273 Giles de Berkeley held Cobberley by one knight’s fee.
[9] J.A. Bennett (ed.), Report on the Manuscripts of Wells Cathedral (Historical Manuscripts Commission, 1885), p. 52
[10] Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem, Volume XI, Edward III (Stationery Office, London, 1935),  no. 307
[11] Calendar of the Patent Rolls, Edward III, 1340-1343, p. 356
[12] W. St. Clair Baddeley, Place-names of Gloucestershire (Gloucester, 1913), p. 6
[13] Charles S. Taylor, An analysis of the Domesday Survey of Gloucestershire, p. 276
[14] W. St. Clair Baddeley, Place-names of Gloucestershire (Gloucester, 1913), p. 61
[15] Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem, Volume X, Edward III (Kraus reprint, 1973),  no. 597
[16] Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem, Volume XI, Edward III (Stationery Office, London, 1935),  no. 307
[17] Calendar of Close Rolls, Edward III, 1360-1364, p. 320
[18] Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem, Volume XII, Edward III (Kraus reprint, 1973),  no. 356
[19] Calendar of the Patent Rolls, Edward III, 1367-1370, p. 377
[20] Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem, Volume XIII, Edward III (Kraus reprint, 1986),  no. 20
[21] Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem, Volume XIII, Edward III (Kraus reprint, 1986),  no. 20
[22] Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem, Volume XIII, Edward III (Kraus reprint, 1986),  no. 20
[23] Calendar of the Patent Rolls, Edward III, 1374-1377, p. 79
[24] Calendar of the Patent Rolls, Richard II, supplement volume, p. 48
[25] W.J. Robinson, West Country Churches (Bristol, 1915), Vol. III, p. 154
[26] Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem, Volume XXIII, 6-10 Henry VI, 1427-1432 (Boydell Press & National Archives, 2004),  no. 721
[27] Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem, Volume XXIII, 6-10 Henry VI, 1427-1432 (Boydell Press & National Archives, 2004),  no. 109
[28] Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem, Volume XXIII, 6-10 Henry VI, 1427-1432 (Boydell Press & National Archives, 2004),  no. 721
[29] Calendar of the Patent Rolls, Henry VI, 1446-1452, p. 377

Tuesday, January 19, 2016

The medieval Cambridge mill in Gloucestershire

The medieval Cambridge mill in Gloucestershire

Niall C.E.J. O’Brien

The mill at Cambridge, on the River Cam, in the manor of Slimbridge in Gloucestershire, was much like a medieval mill in any other part of medieval England. A mill was an important source of revenue and most, though not all, manors had a mill. The tenants of the manor had to bring their grain to the manorial mill and the miller took part of the grain as his fee. As such the miller was one of the most important lay residents of a manor but not always the most popular. Manorial court records often mention complaints against the miller for the inexactness of his measures and the dishonesty of his fees.

Cambridge location map in Gloucestershire 

Cambridge is today a small hamlet about 3 miles from Dursley and about 11 miles from Gloucester and lies in the parish of Slimbridge. The medieval manor of Slimbridge, which included Cambridge, Gossington and Kingston, was granted to Maurice de Berkeley Fitz Harding by Roger de Berkeley of Dursley before 1190 on the marriage of Maurice and Roger’s daughter.[1] In 1281 Maurice de Berkeley, lord of Berkeley, held Slimbridge from Henry de Berkeley of Dursley by some unknown service as it was given in free marriage. The manor was then worth £20 per year.[2]

Although no specific references to the medieval mill at Cambridge appear to have survived, associated references do exist. In the time of King Edward the First, Thomas de Berkeley (d. 1321), lord of Berkeley, leased the house beside Cambridge mill, which was formerly held by Edith de Cambridge, to William Flerding for the lives of William, his first wife and their issue at a rent of 5s per year. This leased was witnessed by Robert de Bradeston, Thomas de Beoleye, Elias le Botiler, Richard le Due and John Halling; possibly all local people of the Cambridge area.[3]

River Cam in Gloucestershire 

On 22nd July 1310 Thomas de Berkeley, lord of Berkeley, granted to William Flerdyng and Margaret his wife, the messuage, garden, curtilage and croft formerly held by Edith de Cambridge beside the mill. But Thomas de Berkeley reserved sufficient land to improve the millpond at Cambridge. William and Margaret Flerdyng also received pasture rights for forty sheep and one cow. This grant was for the lives of William, Margaret and their son, Peter, at an annual rent of 5s. The grant was given at Berkeley castle and witnessed by Thomas de Styntescombe, Robert de Bradeston, Thomas de Beoleye, William le Botiler and John le Duc.[4] Robert de Bradeston was alive from 1293 to at least 1310.[5]

In June 1313 John atte Yate of Slimbridge granted Thomas de Bekeley a rent seck of 8d from Joan, wife of Walter le Chepmon, for a messuage, curtilage and croft at Slimbridge along with the curtilage above the water running towards Cambridge mill and a croft called bokcroft.[6]
It was the obligation of all tenants to take their corn to the manorial mill and to no other mill. Sometimes a tenant would receive dispensation from the lord of the manor not to do suit at the manorial mill. On 4th May 1318 Thomas de Berkeley remitted to William and Mabel atte Pulle their suit at the mills of Cam and Cambridge and to the two law-days at Cam each year in return for 12d a year paid to the manor of Hurste.[7]

After 1318 references to the mill disappear and even to Cambridge itself. In May 1439 Richard Beauchamp, Earl of Warwick, had two messuages and a half virgate of land at Cambridge, within the lordship of Coaley, worth 10s and held by Thomas Willies; a messuage and fardel of land and meadow, worth 4s, and held by John Willies; and a messuage and three acres of land with meadow, worth 4s, and held by John Maiowe. Al the property held by Richard Beauchamp at Cambridge was not held of the king but of whom the jury did not know.[8]

TYC Motors on site of 19th century mill and possible medieval mill site

Yet the tradition of milling at Cambridge continued over the centuries. In the 1830s a wire mill operated at Cambridge in the area of the present Cambridge Mill Industrial Estate.[9] The exact location of the medieval mill at Cambridge is unknown to this author but based on evidence from other locations, the medieval mill was in the area, if not in the exact spot, of later mills in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. Pre 1850 Joseph and Jonah Hadley operated small water-powered mills at Cambridge and Berkeley before they moved to Gloucester Docks where they operated a steam-powered mill.[10] Today places such as the Cambridge Mills Industrial Estate and Cambridge Mill House keep the memory of milling alive in this rural Gloucestershire community.

===============

End of post

=================




[1] Bridget Wells-Furby (ed.), A catalogue of the medieval muniments at Berkley Castle (2 vols. Bristol & Gloucestershire Archaeological Society, 2004), vol. 1, p. 271
[2] Sidney J. Madge (ed.), Abstracts of inquisitions post mortem for Gloucestershire, part IV, 20 Henry III to 29 Edward I, 1236-1300 (British Record Society, 1903), p. 118
[3] Bridget Wells-Furby (ed.), A catalogue of the medieval muniments at Berkley Castle, vol. 1, p. 290
[4] Bridget Wells-Furby (ed.), A catalogue of the medieval muniments at Berkley Castle, vol. 1, p. 290
[5] Bridget Wells-Furby (ed.), A catalogue of the medieval muniments at Berkley Castle, vol. 1, pp. 163, 290
[6] Bridget Wells-Furby (ed.), A catalogue of the medieval muniments at Berkley Castle, vol. 1, p. 282
[7] Bridget Wells-Furby (ed.), A catalogue of the medieval muniments at Berkley Castle, vol. 1, p. 268
[8] Claire Noble (ed.), Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem, Vol. XXV, 16 to 20 Henry VI, 1437-1442 (Boydell, 2009), no. 286

Wednesday, December 3, 2014

Siston manor, Gloucestershire in 1273 and 1309

Siston manor, Gloucestershire in 1273 and 1309

Niall C.E.J. O’Brien

Introduction

Siston is a small village and parish at the southern end of the County of Gloucestershire which contains 1,827 acres.[1] It is situated about 7 miles east of Bristol Castle, ancient centre of Bristol. The village lies at the confluence of the two sources of the Siston Brook, a tributary of the River Avon. The village consists of a number of cottages and farms centred on St Anne's Church, and the grand Tudor manor house of Siston Court.

The early history of Siston from 1086 to about 1220 was recorded in an earlier article = http://celtic2realms-medievalnews.blogspot.ie/2014/10/siston-gloucestershire-c1086-to-c1220.html = follow the link. In this article we focus on two inquisitions taken in 1273 and 1309 in which we get a picture of the manor and some of the people living and working within.

Siston in 1273

On Thursday in Easter week 1273 an inquisition post mortem was taken at Siston in Gloucestershire, before Sir Robert de Kyngeston, sub-escheator of the county, into the lands held by Robert Waleraund, lately deceased, in the manor of Siston. The jury of twelve good men: Adam Malet, Nicholas Joy, Roger de Hildesle, Hugh de Leytrinton, Richard Poyntel, John Woodcock, Reginald de la Leyegrave, Geoffrey de Fraxino, Thomas de Doynton, William de Ston, Walter le Hope and John de Werneleye found the following information:[2]

Robert Waleraund held the manor of Siston from Lord Henry de Berkeley, Lord of Dursley by the service of one knight’s fee. The manor had one capital messuage with a garden and curtilage which was worth 1 mark. There was a dovecote worth 5 shillings.

Demesne lands 1273

There was two carucates of land in the old demesne worth 50 shillings per year and there was two carucates of new land marled worth 100 shillings. There were 30 acres of meadow worth 60 shillings and several plots of pasture worth 20 shillings. There were two parks and the pasture of same worth 20 shillings. The sale of underwood was worth 1 mark per year while pannage in the parks was worth ½ mark per year. Elsewhere the common pasture of Kingswood and the surrounding area was worth 5 shillings. There were three small vivaries worth 3 shillings.

Tenants in 1273

The rent of the assizes of the free tenants per year was 112 shillings 7½ pence. This was broken down into 16 shillings 3¼ pence at Easter, £4 (80s) at the feast of St. John the Baptist, and 16s 3¼ pence at Michaelmas along with one pound (lb) of pepper. The rent of the customary tenants at Michaelmas was worth 40 shillings. There were twelve customary tenants each holding half a virgate of land and each half virgate was worth in customs and services 6 shillings 2 pence. There were another fourteen customary tenants holding 1 farthindeal of land each and each farthindeal was worth 2 shillings 8½ pence.

In addition to the above there were five cottagers worth 7 shillings 8 pence in all customs and services. The advowson of the church of Siston was worth 5 marks while the pleas and perquisites of the manor court were worth half mark per year.[3] Attached to Siston manor was the manor of Cobberleye which was held by Giles de Berkeley for the service of one knight’s fee. The total value of the manor of Siston was £28 15shillings 2½ pence and 1 lb of pepper.[4]

The inquisition post mortem of 1273 does not give any names of the tenants and it is uncertain if any of the jurymen were tenants. One of the jurymen, Hugh de Leytrinton, was also on the jury in 1273 at Oldbury for the inquisition post mortem for Nicholas Bordun.[5] Elsewhere we learn that Miles de Langley received a messuage and a third of a ploughland in Siston from Matthew de Bredenwick and Isabel his wife.[6]

Siston manor heirs in 1273

Robert Waleraund left no children by his wife, Matilda Russell, daughter of Ralph Russell, and thus Siston became the inheritance of Robert Waleraund, son of Sir William Waleraund, brother of the deceased Robert Waleraund.[7]

Church of St. Ann at Siston

Siston in 1309

The Robert Waleraund who inherited Siston and other lands in Gloucestershire in 1273 died in the reign of Edward II without leaving any males heirs. Siston and the other lands passed to his nephew, John Waleraund. But John Waleraund was declared an idiot and so the king acquired control of the entire Waleraund property. In 1309 a number of inquisitions were held across Gloucestershire and on various dates into the Waleraund property. The inquisition for Siston was taken at Bristol on 20th March 1309 and its findings were retaken in the same form at Wotton on 9th September 1309.[8]

Demesne lands in 1309

The capital messuage with the garden, curtilage and the dovecote was worth 10 shillings. There was 300 acres within the demesne worth 75 shillings or 3 pence per acre. There was 40 acres of meadow worth 40 shillings or 12 pence per acre. The several plots of pasture (total of 40 acres) were worth 20 shillings or 6 pence per acre. The sale of herbage and underwood of the two parks (containing 90 acres) was worth 20 shillings. Also attached to the demesne lands was a certain pasture at Doynton worth 30 shillings. The total value of the demesne lands was £9 15 shillings.[9]

Tenants in 1309

There was in 1309 five free tenants at Siston holding various tenements and paying at the assizes of Easter and Michaelmas 32 shillings 7½ pence in equal portions. There was £4 rent due from the land of Cobberleye in 1309 from Thomas le Botiler which gave a total rent of the assizes of 112 shillings 7½ pence.[10] This was the same total amount as collected in 1273.[11]

What is different about the 1309 inquisition compared to that of 1273 is in the following details of who holds what within the manor of Siston and what labour services they are obliged to give to the lord of the manor.

Work services of the tenants

Richard de Wurmelegh held one messuage and twenty acres of land in villeinage. If Richard paid rent for this land it was not stated. Instead something more important than money rent was stated and that was the work service due to the lord of the manor. In an agricultural environment, in the days before modern machinery, having people to do the work was most important.

Services of Richard de Wurmelegh and his group of tenants

The labour service of Richard de Wurmelegh to the manor was to give 66 manual works between the feast of St. Michael (29th September) and the feast of St. John the Baptist (24th June). These works were worth 2 shillings 9 pence or ½ pence per work.[12] The heavier demand on tenant work service was made in the autumn to spring time with thrashing of the corn. There was also work with sowing and harrowing. Timber was also cut at this time for building or firewood.[13] Another task was hedge planting and removal. The hedges were removed to allow the cattle to walk across the stubble fields and fertilize the said fields. In May and June the third field would be prepared for a period of fallow.[14]

Between the feasts of St. John the Baptist and that of St. Michael, Richard de Wurmelegh was to give 26 manual works, valued at 2 shilling 2 pence or 1 penny per work.[15] This was the important time of the year with haymaking and cutting the corn. Hay was the principal winter feed.[16] Furthermore Richard de Wurmelegh was to give 3 days’ ploughing for winter sowing and 3 days ploughing for spring sowing during Lent along with another 3 days ploughing of fallow land. The full value of this ploughing was 18 pence or 2 pence per day.[17]

Wheat was the usual crop planted at wintertime with oats and barley at springtime. The inquisition does not say if Richard de Wurmelegh provided a plough team, or part of a team, for the work. A full plough team would be of six or eight oxen. It is possible that Richard provided the team as he would need the plough team for his own work. His neighbours would help Richard with his own ploughing and he would help them.[18]

Richard de Wurmelegh was to give one day sowing beans on the lord’s land and this work was worth a half pence. Beans were a popular food and were mixed with pork or other meat at cooking time to make a good sustenance meal. Richard de Wurmelegh was also to spend one day carrying hay and this work was worth 2 pence. Finally at Christmas time Richard de Wurmelegh was to give the lord a hen worth one penny and this was called Wodehen. There were eleven other customars who held the same amount of property and performed the same work duties as Richard.[19]

Ploughing and harvesting on a medieval manor

Services of John Barry and his group of tenants

Another group of ten customars, led by John Barry, held ten acres of land each in villeinage. They gave the following labour services: 98 manual works from the feast of St. Michael to the feast of St. Michael and these were worth 5 shillings 2 pence. The value of the works was broken into 72 works worth half pence and 26 works worth 1 penny. John Barry gave one day planting beans (worth half pence) and one day of weeding with one man (worth half pence) and another one day putting the lord’s hay into cocks (worth 1 penny).[20] 

On monastic estates it is sometimes noted that tenants were to receive food and drink as an allowance for their work. Tenants of the Abbot of Titchfield got bread and beer with flesh or fish for haymaking. On secular estates it appears that no such food allowance was given except may be at the corn harvest.[21] 

Services of Roger Tegelyn and his group of tenants

Roger Tegelyn led another group of three customars who held one cottage and one acre of land for which they paid rent of 12 pence per year (3 pence on 4 separate days) and gave a hen worth one penny to the lord at Christmas. The labour services of this group were to give 3 days’ raising the lord’s hay (worth half pence per day) and 2 days tossing the hay (worth one penny per day).[22]

It is interesting that tenants within the group of Richard de Wurmelegh provided the heavy work like ploughing while those in the groups of John Barry and Roger Tegelyn gave work services that didn’t need oxen as they didn’t have the land to keep the oxen. Another task needing oxen was the carrying obligations. This involved transporting the produce of the manor to market and also returning with goods that the manor could not produce itself.[23]

In addition to these services each customar was to give 3 bedripes in autumn, 75 in total (worth 9 shillings 4½ pence or 1½ pence per work). The same customars were to give a certain tallage at the feast of St. Martin to the lord’s larder, worth 34 shillings.

As the fourteenth century progressed, the work services of tenants was increasing changed to work service in return for pay rather than work service to pay the lord rent for their holding. The scarcity of labour after the Black Death caused an increase in the wages of agricultural labourers which the government tried to suppress. Many lord’s tried to hold onto to the customary services but the increasing opportunities for work with a rising middle class of farmers kept up competition for labour and the increasing use of wages in exchange for work.[24]

Cottages and the manor court

At Siston in 1309 were a further twenty-four people who held one cottage each and paid 28 shillings 8 pence in total rent per year. It is possible that some of the people living in these cottages were the permanent workers on the demesne lands. There were also forty-four acres of land newly given to eleven free tenants for a rent of 15 shillings per year, paid over the four feast days of St. Thomas the Apostle, the Annunciation of the Blessed Mary, the Nativity of St. John the Baptist and the feast of St. Michael. The pleas and perquisites of the manor court were worth 13 shillings 4 pence which gave a sum total of 57 shillings. The value of the entire manor was given as £27 5shillings 11½ pence.[25]

The total value of Siston manor in 1309 is less than in 1273 but the 1309 inquisition makes no mention and gives no value for the advowson of Siston church which, in 1273, was worth 5 marks or £3 7shillings. Excluding the advowson and adding other values such as the pleas of the manor court, which doubled in value, the value of Siston had increased over the thirty-six years. The bad years were still to come in the near and distant future. These included the three years of wet weather (1315-1318) which caused widespread famine and the Black Death of 1349-1351. Thankfully the people of Siston were kept too busy with farm work and other work like carpentry, blacksmithing, tailoring, etc., to find time to think of such days.   

Ownership of Siston in 1309

In 1309 the manor of Siston was in a state of double wardship. Not only did the crown hold it because John Waleraund was an idiot but the chief lord of the manor, William de Berkeley, was under age and thus his property was in wardship.[26]

Having stated the above facts the jury went on to declare that the manor of Siston should passed to Alan, son of Alan Plokenet. This Alan Plokenet was grandson of Alice, daughter of Isabella, daughter of Thomas de Rocheford and his wife, Agatha because Thomas de Berkeley gave Siston to Thomas and Agatha on their marriage. Alice, the daughter of Isabella, had granted Siston to Robert Waleraund for a term of years and thus Robert Waleraund had no title to the manor after his death.[27] The families of Rocheford and Waleraund were connected with each other and with the Berkeley family of Dursley (chief owners of Siston) since about 1210. Isabel, daughter of Roger IV de Berkeley of Dursley first married Thomas de Rocheford about 1205 and later married William Waleraund.[28]

When Joan Plokenet, wife of Alan Plokenet, senior, and mother of Alan Plokenet, died in July 1318 it was said that Alan junior was thirty years of age.[29] Alan Plokenet, junior, died on 10th September 1326 leaving land in Berkshire, Herefordshire and Staffordshire but no land in Gloucestershire.[30] The Plokenet estate had greatly decreased since his father’s death in 1299. Alan Plokenet, senior, held land in the Counties of Berkshire, Oxfordshire, Somerset, Wiltshire, Dorset, Southampton and Hereford. Some of the manors held in Wiltshire and Dorset were held of the heir of Robert Waleraund. The manor of Salterton in Wiltshire was held for the sustenance of the idiot, John Waleraund.[31] The inquisition post mortem of Robert Waleraund in 1273 for the manor of Langford in Wiltshire stated that Alan Plokenet, senior, was a nephew of Robert Waleraund.[32]

The only Gloucestershire land held by Alan Plokenet was Little Teynton in 1307 and leased to Bevis de Knovill for the service of a pair of gloves.[33] The acquisition of Siston therefore gave the servants of Alan Plokenet much more work to do after their long travel to Gloucestershire. Alan Plokenet took over Siston by 1313 and may have been earlier. We learn elsewhere that he was to give Sir Nicholas de Kingston two robes a year from Siston but he ceased this payment in 1313 and 1320 when Sir Nicholas took him to court for payment but was unsuccessful.[34]

Conclusion

The two inquisitions for Siston in 1273 and 1309 give us a view into the life and conditions on this Gloucestershire manor. Of course the differences in information contained in the two inquisitions tell us that we only got a glimpse of life. There is much about Siston that we don’t know about and may never find out such as what was the story of Thomas of Siston, living in Bristol in 1273, who had an interest in a tenement and shop in Gloucester.[35]

===========

End of post

===========





[1] Charles S. Taylor, An analysis of the Domesday Survey of Gloucestershire (Bristol & Gloucestershire Archaeological Society, 1889), p. 305
[2] Sidney J. Madge (ed.), Abstracts of Inquisitions Post Mortem for Gloucestershire, part IV, 20 Henry III to 29 Edward I, 1236-1300 (British Record Society, London, 1903), p. 59
[3] Sidney Madge (ed.), Abstracts of Inquisitions Post Mortem for Gloucestershire, part IV, 1236-1300, p. 59
[4] Sidney Madge (ed.), Abstracts of Inquisitions Post Mortem for Gloucestershire, part IV, 1236-1300, p. 60
[5] Sidney Madge (ed.), Abstracts of Inquisitions Post Mortem for Gloucestershire, part IV, 1236-1300, p. 73
[6] C.R. Elrington (ed.), Abstracts of Feet of Fines relating to Gloucestershire, 1199-1299 (Gloucestershire Record Society, vol. 16, 2003), no. 775
[7] Sidney Madge (ed.), Abstracts of Inquisitions Post Mortem for Gloucestershire, part IV, 1236-1300, pp. 60, 61
[8] Edward Alexander Fry (ed.), Abstracts of Inquisitions Post Mortem for Gloucestershire, part V, 30 Edward I to 32 Edward III, 1302-1358 (British Record Society, London, 1910), pp. 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111
[9] Edward A. Fry (ed.), Abstracts of Inquisitions Post Mortem for Gloucestershire, part V, 1302-1358, p. 109
[10] Edward A. Fry (ed.), Abstracts of Inquisitions Post Mortem for Gloucestershire, part V, 1302-1358, p. 109
[11] Sidney Madge (ed.), Abstracts of Inquisitions Post Mortem for Gloucestershire, part IV, 1236-1300, p. 59
[12] Edward A. Fry (ed.), Abstracts of Inquisitions Post Mortem for Gloucestershire, part V, 1302-1358, p. 109
[13] T.J. Hunt (ed.), The medieval customs of the Manors of Taunton and Bradford on Tone (Somerset Record Society, vol. 66, 1962), pp. xxx, xxxii
[14] Nathaniel J. Hone, The manor and manorial records (Methuen, London, 1925), p. 90
[15] Edward A. Fry (ed.), Abstracts of Inquisitions Post Mortem for Gloucestershire, part V, 1302-1358, p. 109
[16] Nathaniel J. Hone, The manor and manorial records, pp. 83, 87
[17] Edward A. Fry (ed.), Abstracts of Inquisitions Post Mortem for Gloucestershire, part V, 1302-1358, p. 109
[18] T.J. Hunt (ed.), The medieval customs of the Manors of Taunton and Bradford on Tone, p. xxviii
[19] Edward A. Fry (ed.), Abstracts of Inquisitions Post Mortem for Gloucestershire, part V, 1302-1358, p. 110
[20] Edward A. Fry (ed.), Abstracts of Inquisitions Post Mortem for Gloucestershire, part V, 1302-1358, p. 110
[21] Nathaniel J. Hone, The manor and manorial records, pp. 106, 107
[22] Edward A. Fry (ed.), Abstracts of Inquisitions Post Mortem for Gloucestershire, part V, 1302-1358, p. 110
[23] T.J. Hunt (ed.), The medieval customs of the Manors of Taunton and Bradford on Tone, p. xxxiv
[24] May McKisack, The Fourteenth Century 1307-1399 (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1997), pp. 334, 335
[25] Edward A. Fry (ed.), Abstracts of Inquisitions Post Mortem for Gloucestershire, part V, 1302-1358, p. 110
[26] Edward A. Fry (ed.), Abstracts of Inquisitions Post Mortem for Gloucestershire, part V, 1302-1358, p. 109
[27] Edward A. Fry (ed.), Abstracts of Inquisitions Post Mortem for Gloucestershire, part V, 1302-1358, pp. 110-11
[28] Bridget Wells-Furby (ed.), A catalogue of the medieval muniments at Berkeley Castle (2 vols. Gloucestershire Record Society, vol. 18, 2004), Vol. 2, p. 865
[29] J. E. E. S. Sharp (ed.), Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem, Vol. 5, Edward II (Kraus reprint, Liechtenstein, 1973), no. 546
[30] J. E. E. S. Sharp (ed.), Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem, Vol. 6, Edward II (Kraus reprint, Liechtenstein, 1973), nos. 678, 688
[31] J. E. E. S. Sharp (ed.), Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem, Vol. 3, Edward I (Kraus reprint, Liechtenstein, 1973), no. 543
[32] J. E. E. S. Sharp (ed.), Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem, Vol. 2, Edward I (Kraus reprint, Liechtenstein, 1973), p. 7
[33] J. E. E. S. Sharp (ed.), Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem, Vol. 4, Edward I (Kraus reprint, Liechtenstein, 1973), no. 446
[34] Bridget Wells-Furby (ed.), A catalogue of the medieval muniments at Berkeley Castle (2 vols. Gloucestershire Record Society, vol. 17, 2004), Vol. 1, p. 554
[35] W.H. Stevenson (ed.), Calendar of the Records of the Corporation of Gloucester (Gloucester, 1893), no. 637