The
tragic story of Thomas Duffield, merchant of York
Niall
C.E.J. O’Brien
Much of my medieval
history is concerned with Ireland and the West Country of England. It is from
these places that much of my source material is sourced from and a historian
needs his or her sources to help recreate the past and understand its story. Yet
while doing research on the town of Bridgwater in Somerset among the record
books known as the Inquisitions Post Mortem I came across as series of entries
concerning Thomas Duffield of York and his family which struck something of the
human touch inside me (there was also a Thomas Duffield in Bridgwater c.1380). Apparently, it seems I have a human touch – which could
have been worst – I could have had a Midas touch and then could not eat those
lovely sultana buns they have in the local shop as they would turn to gold
before reaching the pleasures of the mouth.
But what dear Reader,
could have created this soft side of my character in the life of a merchant
living in York in the time of King Henry VI? Well, it has to do more with the
death of Thomas Duffield more so than his life. Thomas Duffield died on 10th
March 1429 leaving a widow, Elizabeth, and two daughters, Margaret and
Elizabeth. An inquisition into his property in the city of York was taken on 22nd
March 1429.
This inquisition found
that Thomas Duffield held 21 messuages of the king in burgage within the city. These
were valued at 72 shillings 8 pence per year. The location and value per year of
these 21 messuages are given in Appendix One below. A messuage is usually
defined as a house and garden. Thomas Duffield also held a further 25 messuages
(valued at 64 shillings 4 pence) in burgage tenure in York and five tenements
at Aldwick valued at 15 shillings (see Appendix One).[1]
A medieval street in York where Thomas Duffield could have walked
Many years later, on 17th
June 1338, another inquisition post mortem, taken at Bedale found that Thomas
Duffield held further property at Skelton. This property is described in Appendix
Three below.[2]
Another inquisition relating to the Skelton property was taken on 4th
November 1438 which gave much the same details as the June inquisition.[3]
The early history of
Thomas Duffield is unknown to this author. It is possible that our Thomas
Duffield, merchant, was the same person called Thomas Dreffeld, mercer, who was
admitted to the freedom of York in 1361. A mercer is usually defined as a
person dealing in textiles.[4]
Our Thomas Duffield could also be the Thomas son of John Duffield who in
1409-10 was admitted to the freedom of York.[5]
As said, Thomas
Duffield, merchant, died on 10th March 1429 under unknown
circumstances. Was it a sudden death or the result of a long illness? This is,
as yet, unknown. What is known is that the death did bring great sadness on the
Duffield household after a time of great celebrations. Only two days before
Thomas Duffield died, his wife Elizabeth gave birth to a daughter on 8th
March 1429 who they called Elizabeth Duffield.
Medieval birth was
always a dangerous time, for mother and baby alike, but it seems that both were
well on that day. Thomas and Elizabeth Duffield had another daughter called
Margaret who was born about September 1422. There may have been other children
born to Thomas and Elizabeth but they did not survive to adulthood.
Unfortunately, for the Duffield household, young Elizabeth Duffield did not
survive to adulthood either.
Ill health
complications affected baby Elizabeth and she quickly went downhill. On 21st
March 1429, just eleven days after her father died, baby Elizabeth Duffield
died.[6]
The joy and happiness which filled young Margaret Duffield at having a younger
sister now was turned to sadness.
For Elizabeth Duffield
the death within days of her husband and baby daughter after the joy of a
successful birth must have been devastating. The health of poor Elizabeth
Duffield broke under the weight of the loss and she became sicker as the days
passed. On 23rd May 1429, Elizabeth Duffield died leaving her
daughter Margaret Duffield without any family. Such was the speed of her death
that an inquisition held in York on 28th June 1429 found that Elizabeth
Duffield had no time to acquire any lands or tenements from her husband as her
dower lands.[7]
Instead all the lands and tenements of her husband Thomas Duffield fell to the
king.
The king had first
taken control of the lands and tenements of Thomas Duffield following his death
when his children were taken into wardship. Young baby Elizabeth Duffield was
entitled to half the property with her sister Margaret Duffield having the
other half but her early death meant that all the property passed to the inheritance
of Margaret. As Margaret Duffield was only six and half years old when all her
family died in 1429, and thus a minor, her care fell to the king.
The lands and tenements
stayed with the king until 1338/1339. Beginning in November 1338 a series on inquisitions
was held into the Duffield property in York and Skelton.[8]
The description of the property in York differs somewhat from that given in
1429 as messuages became tenements (see Appendix Two). This city property was
worth 30 shillings 8 pence. This same property was worth 152 shillings in 1429
– so much for royal care.
In December 1339 the
king ordered the escheator of Yorkshire to take the fealty of Margaret
Duffield.[9] I
have no record of Margaret Duffield after 1339 but hopefully she had a good and
long life after the early loss of her family.
Appendix
One
The 21 messuages of
Thomas Duffield in York held of the king
St. Andrew Gate = one
messuage = 20 shillings
St. Andrew’s Church, in
the churchyard = 3 messuages = 2 shillings each = total 6 shillings
Same place as above = 3
messuages = 4 shillings each = 12 shillings
Same place as above =
one messuage = 3 shillings
Same place as above = 2
messuages = 3 shillings = total 6 shillings
St. Andrew’s Church, in
the vennel (public lane way between the gable of two houses) below the
churchyard = 4 messuages = 2 shillings each = total 8 shillings
Same place as above = 2
messuages = 2 shillings 6 pence = total 5 shillings
Same place as above =
one messuage = 2 shillings 8 pence
Peaseholme = 4
messuages = 2 shillings each = total 8 shillings
The 25 messuages in
burgage with gardens in York held by Thomas Duffield in 1429
Little St. Andrew Gate
= 8 messuages together on the east side = 2 shillings each = total 16 shillings
Little St. Andrew Gate
in the vennel on the eastern side = 4 messuages = 18 pence each = total 6
shillings
Same place as above =
one messuage = 12 pence
Same place as above =
one messuage = 16 pence
Same place as above =
one garden = 8 pence
Little St. Andrew Gate
on the western side = on tenement = 4 shillings
Same place as above =
one tenement = 5 shillings
Same place as above =
one tenement = 6 shillings
Same place as above =
one tenement = 20 pence
Same place as above = 4
tenement = 2 shillings each = total 8 shillings
Same place as above = 2
tenement = 16 pence each = 2 shillings 8 pence
Lower Ouse Gate = one
tenement = 14 shillings
Tenements at Aldwick
At Aldwark Thomas
Duffield held 5 tenements worth 3 shillings each = total 15 shillings at the
time of his death.[10]
Appendix
Two
Duffield property in
the city of York as described in 1439[11]
St. Saviour Gate = one
tenement = value 8 shillings per year
Ouse Gate = one
tenement = value 10 shillings
Peaseholme = 4 small
tenements under one roof = value 12 pence each
Aldwick = 5 small
tenements under one roof = 12 pence each
Little St. Andrew Gate
= 5 tenements under one roof = value 18 pence each
Same place = 7
tenements under one roof = value 12 pence each
Garth Lane = 3 small
tenements under one roof = value 8 pence each
Same place = 3 other
small tenements under one roof = value 8 pence each
Same place = small
garden = 10 pence
St. Andrew’s Churchyard
= 5 small tenements under one roof = value 18 pence each
Same place – on each
side of a lane = 7 small tenements built under one roof = value 10 pence
each
Appendix
Three
Property of Thomas
Duffield at Skelton, Yorkshire[12]
A close called Portburn
with 10 acres of land – value 2 shillings – held of the king for 10 shillings
per year
A wood called Hordhirn
& 200 acres pasture – value 2 shillings – held of the king by one sixth of
a knight’s fee
A field called Halefeld
containing 3 bovates – value 4 shillings – held of the abbot of St. Mary’s York
and rendering 5 shillings per year in services
A capital messuage with
3 small buildings and 4 bovates (of arable in 1438) and three closes containing
a bovate each – value 14 shillings – held of Joan, Countess of Westmoreland
A bovate was defined as
about fifteen acres.
============
End of post
============
[1]
Claire Noble (ed.), Calendar of
inquisitions post mortem preserved in the Public Record Office, Vol. XXIII, 6
to 10 Henry VI, 1427-1432 (Boydell Press & National Archives, 2004),
no. 200
[2]
Claire Noble (ed.), Calendar of
inquisitions post mortem preserved in the Public Record Office, Vol. XXV, 16 to
20 Henry VI, 1437-1442 (Boydell Press & National Archives, 2009), no.
48
[3]
Claire Noble (ed.), Calendar of
inquisitions post mortem, Vol. XXV, 16 to 20 Henry VI, 1437-1442, no. 179
[4] http://www.british-history.ac.uk/report.aspx?compid=50493&strquery=Thomas%20Duffeld
accessed on 21 June 2014
[5] http://www.british-history.ac.uk/report.aspx?compid=48267&strquery=Thomas+Duffeld
accessed on 21 June 2014
[6]
Claire Noble (ed.), Calendar of
inquisitions post mortem, Vol. XXV, 16 to 20 Henry VI, 1437-1442, no. 48
[7]
Claire Noble (ed.), Calendar of
inquisitions post mortem, Vol. XXIII, 6 to 10 Henry VI, 1427-1432, no. 199
[8]
Claire Noble (ed.), Calendar of
inquisitions post mortem, Vol. XXV, 16 to 20 Henry VI, 1437-1442, nos.
178-182
[9] Calendar Close Rolls, Henry VI,
1339-1340
[10]
Claire Noble (ed.), Calendar of
inquisitions post mortem, Vol. XXIII, 6 to 10 Henry VI, 1427-1432, no. 200
[11]
Claire Noble (ed.), Calendar of
inquisitions post mortem, Vol. XXV, 16 to 20 Henry VI, 1437-1442, no. 178
[12]
Claire Noble (ed.), Calendar of
inquisitions post mortem, Vol. XXV, 16 to 20 Henry VI, 1437-1442, no. 48
Poor Margaret! Interesting to find this social history during your research Niall.
ReplyDeleteThanks Susan. Yes indeed a poor Margaret. You have to keep a third eye open for these things while doing other work. Just noticed the daughter 2 days old when her father dead while flicking through pages and the rest is history as they say.
Delete